Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
1038 messages
08 January 2006
Re: -HEAD compile failure on OpenBSD-current Tom Lane (21:34)
Re: Libpq COPY optimization Tom Lane (19:51)
Re: stat /etc/localtime 38000 times on startup? Tom Lane (19:47)
Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (19:41)
Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (19:00)
Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (18:44)
Re: Libpq COPY optimization Luke Lonergan (18:25)
Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (16:59)
Re: Stats collector performance improvement Greg Stark (16:49)
Re: plperl header fix and rationalisation Andrew Dunstan (15:52)
Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working on mips[el]? Jim Buttafuoco (14:52)
plperl header fix and rationalisation Andrew Dunstan (14:37)
Re: stat /etc/localtime 38000 times on startup? Magnus Hagander (14:05)
Libpq COPY optimization Alon Goldshuv (14:00)
stat /etc/localtime 38000 times on startup? Andrew Dunstan (13:52)
Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (13:33)
Re: Stats collector performance improvement Hannu Krosing (12:18)
-HEAD compile failure on OpenBSD-current Stefan Kaltenbrunner (09:54)
ISO 8601 Intervals Larry Rosenman (03:12)
Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (00:58)
Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (00:57)
07 January 2006
Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (22:35)
Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (22:25)
Test tool for sinval reset situations Tom Lane (22:03)
Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (20:08)
Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou (19:57)
Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (19:27)
Re: CIDR/INET improvements Joachim Wieland (19:18)
Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (19:03)
Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (18:38)
Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (18:08)
Re: CIDR/INET improvements Tom Lane (17:50)
Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (17:39)
Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Greg Stark (17:12)
CIDR/INET improvements Joachim Wieland (13:02)
Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou (08:02)
Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Greg Stark (07:52)
Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou (07:06)
Re: Warning on certain configuration file changes Tom Lane (04:38)
Warning on certain configuration file changes Peter Eisentraut (00:47)
06 January 2006
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (23:37)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus (23:20)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (21:13)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Tom Lane (18:08)
Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (17:16)
Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (17:11)
Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (16:59)
Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (16:45)
Re: could not access status of transaction 0 Stefan Kaltenbrunner (16:28)
Re: could not access status of transaction 0 Tom Lane (16:18)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Jim C. Nasby (16:09)
could not access status of transaction 0 Stefan Kaltenbrunner (16:02)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (06:24)
Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou (03:50)
Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (02:13)
Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (02:09)
Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou (01:37)
Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Tom Lane (01:17)
Re: Questions on printtup() Tom Lane (00:42)
05 January 2006
Questions on printtup() Qingqing Zhou (22:31)
Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (22:16)
Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Simon Riggs (21:56)
Re: when can we get better partitioning? Joshua D. Drake (21:53)
when can we get better partitioning? hubert depesz lubaczewski (21:35)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Jim C. Nasby (19:58)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus (19:34)
Re: Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (17:47)
Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian (17:27)
Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian (17:23)
Re: postmaster/postgres options assimilation plan Bruce Momjian (16:04)
Re: nicer error out in initdb? Tom Lane (15:54)
Re: [PATCHES] TRUNCATE, VACUUM, ANALYZE privileges Rod Taylor (15:40)
nicer error out in initdb? Andrew Dunstan (15:27)
Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases Bruce Momjian (15:17)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (15:12)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (15:02)
Re: [PATCHES] TRUNCATE, VACUUM, ANALYZE privileges Stephen Frost (14:40)
Re: [PATCHES] TRUNCATE, VACUUM, ANALYZE privileges Michael Paesold (14:37)
Re: [PATCHES] TRUNCATE, VACUUM, ANALYZE privileges Stephen Frost (14:03)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Rod Taylor (13:59)
Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases Marko Kreen (10:31)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs (08:11)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus (06:30)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus (06:27)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus (06:23)
Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (05:51)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (05:34)
Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases Tom Lane (04:28)
Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message Tom Lane (03:21)
Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message Bruce Momjian (03:03)
Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases Andrew Dunstan (02:51)
Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases Kris Jurka (02:26)
Re: QNX mention in tuplesort.c Tom Lane (02:13)
Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message Tom Lane (02:10)
Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message Robert Treat (02:04)
QNX mention in tuplesort.c Bruce Momjian (01:52)
Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message Tom Lane (01:37)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Trent Shipley (01:10)
Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases Tom Lane (01:08)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs (00:57)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs (00:24)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (00:22)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs (00:05)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus (00:01)
04 January 2006
back-patching locale environment fix Tom Lane (23:22)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus (23:20)
Re: Vacuum Blocking A Deleteion - Why? Tom Lane (22:17)
Vacuum Blocking A Deleteion - Why? Brad Nicholson (21:23)
Re: psql & readline & win32 Andrew Dunstan (20:34)
Re: psql & readline & win32 Magnus Hagander (20:07)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Tom Lane (19:49)
Re: Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Josh Berkus (19:36)
Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs (19:10)
Re: postmaster/postgres options assimilation plan Tom Lane (16:40)
postmaster/postgres options assimilation plan Peter Eisentraut (15:34)
Re: psql & readline & win32 Tino Wildenhain (14:55)
Re: psql & readline & win32 John DeSoi (14:40)
Re: Incremental Backup Script Gregor Zeitlinger (09:29)
Re: Incremental Backup Script Rick Gigger (07:49)
Re: [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup Rick Gigger (07:39)
Re: [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup Rick Gigger (07:20)
Re: Deferrable UNIQUE INDEX? David Fetter (04:34)
Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian (04:24)
Re: Deferrable UNIQUE INDEX? Tom Lane (04:17)
Re: Incremental Backup Script Zach Bagnall (03:41)
Re: Deferrable UNIQUE INDEX? Michael Glaesemann (02:27)
Re: Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Euler Taveira de Oliveira (02:18)
Re: Deferrable UNIQUE INDEX? Andrew Dunstan (02:15)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
pgsql-hackers 2006-01 Chronological Index (5/6)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 03:19:05 20121038 messages
- 09 January 2006
- Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Bruce Momjian (23:50)
- Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (23:48)
- Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (23:43)
- Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Bruce Momjian (23:39)
- Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (23:19)
- Re: cleaning up plperl warnings Bruce Momjian (23:11)
- Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane (22:49)
- Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Neil Conway (22:38)
- Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (21:23)
- Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (20:30)
- Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane (19:51)
- Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Neil Conway (19:42)
- Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (19:41)
- Re: PLs and domain constraints Neil Conway (19:29)
- Re: PLs and domain constraints Tom Lane (19:28)
- Re: PLs and domain constraints Thomas Hallgren (19:23)
- Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (18:28)
- Re: [PATCHES] plpgsql: check domain constraints Tom Lane (18:20)
- Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (18:05)
- Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane (17:57)
- Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Neil Conway (17:17)
- Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (17:06)
- Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Jim Buttafuoco (16:47)
- Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (16:25)
- Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (16:21)
- Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Kurt Roeckx (16:21)
- Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (16:03)
- Re: Stats collector performance improvement Hannu Krosing (15:48)
- Re: ISO 8601 Intervals Ron Mayer (15:16)
- Re: ISO 8601 Intervals Ron Mayer (15:06)
- Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (14:38)
- Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Jim Buttafuoco (14:21)
- Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Stefan Kaltenbrunner (14:03)
- Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Jim Buttafuoco (13:40)
- Re: ISO 8601 Intervals Larry Rosenman (13:35)
- Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (12:17)
- Re: ISO 8601 Intervals Michael Glaesemann (11:45)
- Re: Incremental Backup Script Gregor Zeitlinger (11:01)
- Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Lukas Smith (10:52)
- Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs (10:28)
- Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Stefan Kaltenbrunner (07:55)
- Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Greg Stark (05:39)
- =?windows-874?b?vrnRoafSubjYw6HSw8LYpOPLweggTW9kZXJuIE9mZmljZSBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IFN5c3RlbQ==?= Waso Training Center (04:05)
- Re: TODO: Allow INET + INT4 to increment the host part of the address Tom Lane (03:35)
- TODO: Allow INET + INT4 to increment the host part of the address kevin brintnall (03:29)
- Fw: Returned mail: see transcript for details Jim Buttafuoco (01:17)
- lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane (01:04)
- cleaning up plperl warnings Andrew Dunstan (22:14)
- Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (23:05)
- Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Kenneth Marshall (23:56)
- Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou (23:24)
- Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Jim C. Nasby (23:57)