Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
- Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:38:36 -0500
- Message-id: <2560(dot)1135816716(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes: > The issue is whether anything you want to ORDER BY needs to be > described by an B-tree operator class, and hence have a real sort > function. > 1. Do people have any problems with this? > 2. Would a patch for this be accepted seperate from the whole collation > stuff? I think it's reasonable to remove that feature, *after* we provide a workable substitute. So, "no" to both questions ... regards, tom lane
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT
- From: Martijn van Oosterhout
- Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT
- References:
- Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT
- From: Martijn van Oosterhout
- Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT
- Prev by Date: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin translation to italian language
- Next by Date: Re: localization problem (and solution)
- Previous by thread: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT
- Next by thread: Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT
- Indexes: