Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...
- From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:50:03 +0200
- Message-id: <1135151404(dot)3575(dot)6(dot)camel(at)localhost(dot)localdomain>
Ühel kenal päeval, T, 2005-12-20 kell 17:18, kirjutas Tom Lane: > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes: > > i was just wondering about the status of hannu's concurrent vacuum patch. > > are there any plans to integrate this > > I still don't trust it (assuming that you're thinking of the same patch > I am). What could I do to increase your trust in it ? Could you think of any specific case it could break ? Or any specific tests to check for it ? I attach the version of the patch for 8.1.0 for anyone interested in checking it. -------------- Hannu
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...
- From: Hannu Krosing
- Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...
- References:
- status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...
- From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig
- Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...
- From: Tom Lane
- status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...
- Prev by Date: Re: localization problem (and solution)
- Next by Date: problem with nasty latin2 sorting
- Previous by thread: Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...
- Next by thread: Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...
- Indexes: