Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
1262 messages
06 December 2005
Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Uwe C. Schroeder (23:21)
Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Jim C. Nasby (23:01)
Re: more locale problems on Windows Andrew Dunstan (22:07)
Re: Replication on the backend Aly S.P Dharshi (21:37)
Re: more locale problems on Windows Magnus Hagander (21:33)
Re: more locale problems on Windows Magnus Hagander (21:33)
more locale problems on Windows Andrew Dunstan (21:20)
Re: Weird Grant/Revoke/Usage behavior Tom Lane (21:12)
Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing (21:07)
Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Tom Lane (21:02)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian (21:00)
Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing (20:58)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Peter Eisentraut (20:47)
Re: Ideas for easier debugging of backend problems Bruce Momjian (20:47)
Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing (20:45)
more locale problems on Windows Andrew Dunstan (20:43)
Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Tom Lane (20:41)
Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Tom Lane (20:39)
Slow email caught in the act Jim C. Nasby (20:36)
Re: Weird Grant/Revoke/Usage behavior Bruce Momjian (20:29)
Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing (20:29)
Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing (20:26)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian (20:25)
Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Tom Lane (20:12)
Re: Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini (20:10)
Re: Replication on the backend Rick Gigger (20:04)
Re: Replication on the backend Rick Gigger (20:00)
Re: Replication on the backend Michael Meskes (19:54)
Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Jochem van Dieten (19:50)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian (19:32)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Tom Lane (19:28)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian (19:26)
Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Simon Riggs (18:33)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Bruce Momjian (18:27)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Tom Lane (18:20)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Rod Taylor (17:27)
Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Tom Lane (17:20)
Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Bruce Momjian (17:09)
Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Tom Lane (17:03)
Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Alvaro Herrera (16:48)
Re: Replication on the backend Mario Weilguni (16:23)
Re: Replication on the backend Chris Browne (16:04)
Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne (15:44)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (15:43)
Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne (15:39)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (15:38)
Re: Replication on the backend Markus Schiltknecht (15:19)
Re: Replication on the backend Jan Wieck (15:11)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (14:50)
Re: Bug in pg_dump -c with casts Christopher Kings-Lynne (14:48)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (14:29)
Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Hannu Krosing (14:12)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 John D. Burger (13:35)
Re: Replication on the backend Markus Schiltknecht (13:15)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (13:12)
Re: Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini (12:03)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Dave Page (11:11)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1 Nicolai Tufar (08:59)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1 Nicolai Tufar (08:52)
Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr (08:15)
Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr (08:09)
Re: inet to bigint? Christopher Kings-Lynne (08:08)
Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr (08:05)
Re: inet to bigint? Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:49)
Re: inet to bigint? hubert depesz lubaczewski (07:48)
Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr (07:44)
inet to bigint? Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:30)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Tom Lane (06:02)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Michael Fuhr (05:51)
Re: Replication on the backend Jan Wieck (05:36)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (05:29)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (05:19)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (05:08)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Bruce Momjian (04:59)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Bruce Momjian (04:39)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (04:24)
Bug in pg_dump -c with casts Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:57)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (03:46)
Re: Replication on the backend Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:36)
Re: Replication on the backend Joshua D. Drake (01:35)
Re: Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini (01:18)
Re: About varlena2 ITAGAKI Takahiro (01:00)
Re: Replication on the backend Chris Browne (00:17)
05 December 2005
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (22:42)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (22:30)
Re: About varlena2 Tom Lane (22:10)
Re: *printf and zero size Kurt Roeckx (22:07)
Re: *printf and zero size Tom Lane (22:03)
About varlena2 Qingqing Zhou (21:44)
Re: *printf and zero size Tom Lane (21:40)
Re: *printf and zero size Bruce Momjian (21:35)
Re: *printf and zero size Tom Lane (21:06)
*printf and zero size Bruce Momjian (20:44)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (20:37)
Re: Shared locking in slru.c Tom Lane (20:32)
Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini (19:38)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (19:33)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi (19:28)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Dave Page (19:15)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Gregory Maxwell (19:07)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (19:02)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Tom Lane (18:31)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (18:20)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (18:19)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Jan Wieck (18:10)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (17:54)
Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Bruce Momjian (17:38)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi (17:31)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Csaba Nagy (17:31)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark (17:12)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Bruce Momjian (16:47)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (16:44)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (16:33)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown (16:28)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (15:56)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (15:45)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Alvaro Herrera (15:09)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (14:47)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (14:36)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (14:20)
Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Hannu Krosing (14:03)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead mark (13:54)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Hans-Juergen Schoenig (09:37)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Simon Riggs (08:44)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Simon Riggs (08:37)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Simon Riggs (08:28)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark (06:54)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (06:45)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown (06:41)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Bruce Momjian (05:21)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Gavin Sherry (04:44)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Tom Lane (03:45)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (03:29)
Re: MIN() performance regression 8.0 -> 8.1 Tom Lane (03:29)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:57)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark (01:27)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark (00:55)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Michael Glaesemann (00:53)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Jan Wieck (00:50)
04 December 2005
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (23:08)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi (23:05)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Tino Wildenhain (22:25)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Bruce Momjian (22:09)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi (21:54)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Andrew Dunstan (21:49)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Bruce Momjian (21:29)
Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too Andrew Dunstan (21:28)
Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too Bruce Momjian (21:14)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi (20:56)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi (20:50)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown (20:15)
Er ... does port/snprintf.c actually work? Tom Lane (19:17)
MIN() performance regression 8.0 -> 8.1 Paul Lindner (19:00)
Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too Andrew Dunstan (18:58)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (18:57)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Martijn van Oosterhout (18:56)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (18:53)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Pollard, Mike (18:48)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (18:33)
Upcoming PG re-releases Gregory Maxwell (17:19)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown (17:18)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Tom Lane (16:52)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Paul Lindner (16:41)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
pgsql-hackers 2005-12 Chronological Index (6/8)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 03:19:20 20121262 messages
- 07 December 2005
- Re: row is too big: size 8916, maximum size 8136 Tom Lane (03:19)
- Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:03)
- Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Michael Fuhr (03:02)
- Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:00)
- Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Michael Fuhr (02:53)
- Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:29)
- Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Michael Fuhr (02:22)
- row is too big: size 8916, maximum size 8136 Euler Taveira de Oliveira (02:03)
- Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Michael Glaesemann (01:50)
- Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:44)
- Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:40)
- Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Greg Stark (00:32)
- Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Tom Lane (00:24)
- Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Greg Stark (00:18)
- Re: Slow email caught in the act Marc G. Fournier (23:21)
- Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (22:43)
- Re: SERIAL type feature request Andrew Dunstan (23:22)