pgsql-hackers - December 2005

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Dec. 1, 2005

Thread Author Time
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Christopher Kings-Lynne 01:21
Re: [ADMIN] ERROR: could not read block Qingqing Zhou 01:22
Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases David Fetter 01:36
Problem with COPY CSV 📎 Christopher Kings-Lynne 01:41
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Andrew Dunstan 02:21
Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases Marc G. Fournier 03:56
Re: Problem with COPY CSV Andrew Dunstan 04:20
Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases Joshua D. Drake 04:22
Another way to reduce pg_subtrans lookup overhead Tom Lane 04:38
Re: [ADMIN] ERROR: could not read block Tom Lane 05:00
Re: [ADMIN] ERROR: could not read block Qingqing Zhou 05:09
Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases David Fetter 05:15
Re: A couple of proposed pgbench changes Tatsuo Ishii 07:13
Vertical Partitioning with TOAST 📎 Junji TERAMOTO 08:59
Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases Richard Huxton 10:06
generalizing the planner knobs Neil Conway 10:30
Docs misspelling Christopher Kings-Lynne 10:33
Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases Euler Taveira de Oliveira 10:35
Re: Docs misspelling Neil Conway 10:51
Re: Another way to reduce pg_subtrans lookup overhead Alvaro Herrera 11:12
Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases Peter Eisentraut 12:09
Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases Csaba Nagy 12:20
Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases Richard Huxton 12:37
Re: [PATCHES] A couple of proposed pgbench changes Tom Lane 15:07
Re: Another way to reduce pg_subtrans lookup overhead Tom Lane 15:21
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Jonah H. Harris 15:55
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Tom Lane 16:49
Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases Marc G. Fournier 17:00
8.1, OID's and plpgsql Uwe C. Schroeder 17:01
Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases Dave Page 17:10
Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases Andrew Dunstan 17:21
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Richard Huxton 17:25
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Qingqing Zhou 17:32
Re: [PATCHES] A couple of proposed pgbench changes Qingqing Zhou 17:52
Re: Strange interval arithmetic Greg Stark 18:16
Re: Strange interval arithmetic Greg Stark 18:18
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Tom Lane 18:20
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Jaime Casanova 18:24
Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases Magnus Hagander 18:26
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Jonah H. Harris 18:45
pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. Bruce Momjian 20:06
Re: [ADMIN] ERROR: could not read block Tom Lane 20:26
Re: Strange interval arithmetic Greg Stark 20:31
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Martijn van Oosterhout 20:37
Re: [HACKERS] Strange interval arithmetic 📎 Bruce Momjian 20:37
Re: Strange interval arithmetic Tom Lane 20:43
Re: Strange interval arithmetic Michael Fuhr 20:45
Re: [HACKERS] Strange interval arithmetic Tom Lane 20:49
Re: [HACKERS] Strange interval arithmetic Bruce Momjian 20:50
Re: pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. Tom Lane 20:53
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark 20:54
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. Bruce Momjian 21:00
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Tom Lane 21:01
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. Tom Lane 21:06
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. Bruce Momjian 21:12
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Pollard, Mike 21:14
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. Alvaro Herrera 21:20
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. Martijn van Oosterhout 21:31
Re: SHOW ALL output too wide Bruce Momjian 21:36
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set Bruce Momjian 21:38
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is Neil Conway 22:19
Re: Improving count(*) Bruce Momjian 22:33

Dec. 2, 2005

Thread Author Time
Re: Fork-based version of pgbench Tom Lane 00:23
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is Tom Lane 00:37
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. Tom Lane 00:42
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. Tom Lane 00:44
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Gregory Maxwell 02:01
Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane 02:37
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? 📎 Bruce Momjian 02:44
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Christopher Kings-Lynne 02:45
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set Bruce Momjian 02:49
Re: Windows installation notes Greg Sabino Mullane 02:56
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Stephen Frost 03:03
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane 03:14
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Uwe C. Schroeder 03:18
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Pollard, Mike 03:21
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian 03:27
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Neil Conway 03:37
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane 03:43
Re: Please let us know if you will come to the PostgreSQL Anniversary Greg Sabino Mullane 03:45
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Tom Lane 03:56
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian 03:58
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane 04:03
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian 04:34
Weird Grant/Revoke/Usage behavior Joshua D. Drake 05:04
Additional Grant/revoke problem Joshua D. Drake 05:19
Re: Fork-based version of pgbench Greg Stark 06:40
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark 06:44
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Trent Shipley 07:06
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark 07:09
Re: Fork-based version of pgbench Tom Lane 07:11
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane 07:14
Buildfarm: Bear, Branch 2? Michael Glaesemann 07:33
Re: slow IN() clause for many cases Simon Riggs 08:18
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Peter Eisentraut 08:28
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Simon Riggs 08:57
Re: Using multi-row technique with COPY Simon Riggs 09:39
Re: slow IN() clause for many cases Martijn van Oosterhout 09:48
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Csaba Nagy 10:07
Re: Shared locking in slru.c Manfred Koizar 10:09
Graphics in postgress using GTK Anuj Tripathi 10:45
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Martijn van Oosterhout 10:53
Re: Graphics in postgress using GTK Martijn van Oosterhout 11:06
Re: Graphics in postgress using GTK Richard Huxton 11:10
Re: Buildfarm: Bear, Branch 2? Andrew Dunstan 11:54
Re: Buildfarm: Bear, Branch 2? Michael Glaesemann 11:56
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Pollard, Mike 12:57
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane 14:14
Re: Shared locking in slru.c Tom Lane 14:18
[No subject] luckyghio@katamail.com 14:41
postgres questions (semi-joins, algebraic space) luckyghio@katamail.com 14:44
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs 14:53
Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Philip Warner 14:55
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Andrew Dunstan 15:02
Re: Graphics in postgress using GTK Cristian Prieto 15:12
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Rod Taylor 15:20
Re: Graphics in postgress using GTK Jaime Casanova 15:30
Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Tom Lane 15:42
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian 16:47
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Chris Browne 17:14
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian 17:17
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Jaime Casanova 17:25
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane 17:28
Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Bruce Momjian 17:39
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane 17:43
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian 18:03
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane 18:21
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian 18:23
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane 18:32
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? 📎 Bruce Momjian 18:38
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian 18:39
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian 18:42
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane 18:47
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian 18:52
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane 18:54
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Joshua D. Drake 19:01
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian 19:09
Re: What`s wrong with the lists? Greg Sabino Mullane 19:37
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane 19:53
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Alvaro Herrera 20:01
Re: What`s wrong with the lists? Alvaro Herrera 20:05
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane 20:06
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Alvaro Herrera 20:12
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian 20:12
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian 20:14
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane 20:15
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark 20:25
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Alvaro Herrera 20:26
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Joshua D. Drake 20:27
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Tom Lane 20:37
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian 20:44
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark 20:49
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Rod Taylor 20:51
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane 20:55
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian 20:59
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Simon Riggs 21:01
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Gregory Maxwell 21:01
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian 21:05
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane 21:10
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian 21:19
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Gregory Maxwell 21:23
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane 21:30
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Michael Fuhr 22:04
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Alvaro Herrera 22:04
Re: Please let us know if you will come to the PostgreSQL Anniversary Andrew Sullivan 22:07
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian 22:11
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane 22:20
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian 22:23
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane 22:26
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian 22:29
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs 22:34
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian 22:38
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane 22:39
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Jochem van Dieten 22:41
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian 22:41
Re: Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1 Andrew Dunstan 22:45
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane 22:45
Spam 508 Simon Riggs 22:47
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane 22:49
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Simon Riggs 23:01
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Trent Shipley 23:05
Re: Spam 508 Marc G. Fournier 23:19
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane 23:32
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane 23:38
strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Joe Conway 23:44
Re: Spam 508 Tom Lane 23:44
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Jim C. Nasby 23:46
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Tom Lane 23:53
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Tom Lane 23:58
Re: Spam 508 Jan Wieck 23:58

Dec. 3, 2005

Thread Author Time
Re: Spam 508 Marc G. Fournier 00:03
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production Joe Conway 00:06
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Tom Lane 00:11
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production Joe Conway 00:17
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Tom Lane 00:20
Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Philip Warner 00:35
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Tom Lane 00:37
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production Joe Conway 00:40
Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Tom Lane 00:43
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Tom Lane 00:47

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31