Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: slow IN() clause for many cases
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
- Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, andrew(at)supernews(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: slow IN() clause for many cases
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 02:05:41 -0500
- Message-id: <13993(dot)1133334341(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes: > Do these constructs have the same semantics w.r.t. NULL? I think so, though it'd be good to read the spec closely. > Currently arrays can't have nulls That's so last week ;-) regards, tom lane
- References:
- Re: slow IN() clause for many cases
- From: Simon Riggs
- Re: slow IN() clause for many cases
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: slow IN() clause for many cases
- From: Simon Riggs
- Re: slow IN() clause for many cases
- From: Martijn van Oosterhout
- Re: slow IN() clause for many cases
- Prev by Date: Re: BIN()
- Next by Date: Re: Using multi-row technique with COPY
- Previous by thread: Re: slow IN() clause for many cases
- Next by thread: Re: slow IN() clause for many cases
- Indexes: