Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

PostgreSQL
| The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

Search for
  Advanced Search

Re: ice-broker scan thread


  • From: "Jonah H. Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
  • To: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
  • Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
  • Subject: Re: ice-broker scan thread
  • Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 23:51:30 -0500
  • Message-id: <36e682920511282051q432bb176r24f4a025b2f16d40(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>

FYI, I've personally used Oracle 9.2.0.4's async IO on Linux and have seen several installations which make use of it also.


 
On 11/28/05, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Tom Lane wrote:

> Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au > writes:
> > I haven't had time to prototype whether we can easily implement async IO
>
> Just as with any suggestion to depend on threads, you are going to have
> to show results that border on astounding to have any chance of getting
> this in.  Otherwise the portability issues are just going to make it not
> worth the trouble.

The architecture I am looking at would not rely on threads.

I didn't want to jump on list and waive my hands until I had something to
show, but since Qingqing is looking at the issue I thought I better raise
it.

Gavin

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Privacy Policy | PostgreSQL Archives hosted by Command Prompt, Inc. | Designed by tinysofa
Copyright © 1996 – 2008 PostgreSQL Global Development Group