Re: ice-broker scan thread
- From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: ice-broker scan thread
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:38:39 +1100 (EST)
- Message-id: <Pine(dot)LNX(dot)4(dot)58(dot)0511291524470(dot)18419(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > I haven't had time to prototype whether we can easily implement async IO
>
> Just as with any suggestion to depend on threads, you are going to have
> to show results that border on astounding to have any chance of getting
> this in. Otherwise the portability issues are just going to make it not
> worth the trouble.
The architecture I am looking at would not rely on threads.
I didn't want to jump on list and waive my hands until I had something to
show, but since Qingqing is looking at the issue I thought I better raise
it.
Gavin
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index