Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: ice-broker scan thread
- From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: ice-broker scan thread
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:19:50 +1300
- Message-id: <438BD6E6(dot)1000107(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Tom Lane wrote:
Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:I haven't had time to prototype whether we can easily implement async IOJust as with any suggestion to depend on threads, you are going to have to show results that border on astounding to have any chance of getting this in. Otherwise the portability issues are just going to make it not worth the trouble.
Do these ideas require threads in principle? ISTM that there could be (additional) process(es) waiting to perform pre-fetching or async io, and we could use the usual IPC machinary to talk between them...
cheers Mark
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ice-broker scan thread
- From: Qingqing Zhou
- Re: ice-broker scan thread
- References:
- ice-broker scan thread
- From: Qingqing Zhou
- Re: ice-broker scan thread
- From: Gavin Sherry
- Re: ice-broker scan thread
- From: Tom Lane
- ice-broker scan thread
- Prev by Date: Re: ice-broker scan thread
- Next by Date: Re: ice-broker scan thread
- Previous by thread: Re: ice-broker scan thread
- Next by thread: Re: ice-broker scan thread
- Indexes: