Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Re: gprof SELECT COUNT(*) results
- From: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
- To: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Cc: "Ayush Parashar" <aparashar(at)greenplum(dot)com>
- Subject: Re: gprof SELECT COUNT(*) results
- Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:19:36 -0800
- Message-id: <BFAE0358(dot)147EA%llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Title: Re: [HACKERS] gprof SELECT COUNT(*) results
Nice job Qingqing and Tom!
The improved executor / agg performance will likely help BI / data warehouse customers a lot. I’ll get some DBT-3 results to substantiate as soon as we can.
- Luke
On 11/26/05 12:13 AM, "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> wrote:
"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote
>
> I plan to take a look at it soon.
>
"Stand corrected"[Merlin]! In-memory "SELECT COUNT(*)" doubles the
performance due to my test.
- before -
1.56 s
- now -
0.72 s
Regards,
Qingqing
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index