Re: gprof SELECT COUNT(*) results
- From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
- To: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>
- Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: gprof SELECT COUNT(*) results
- Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:39:21 +0000
- Message-id: <1133008761(dot)2906(dot)121(dot)camel(at)localhost(dot)localdomain>
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 03:13 -0500, Qingqing Zhou wrote:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote
> >
> > I plan to take a look at it soon.
> >
>
> "Stand corrected"[Merlin]! In-memory "SELECT COUNT(*)" doubles the
> performance due to my test.
>
> - before -
> 1.56 s
>
> - now -
> 0.72 s
>
...and for emphasis: this optimization of SeqScans is not possible with
any other database system, so its a big win for PostgreSQL.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index