Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload
Date: 2005-11-12 17:44:23
Message-ID: 28450.1131817463@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> If we don't like imposing link time constraints, we could require
> people to include:

> #ifdef PG_MAGIC_BLOCK
> PG_MAGIC_BLOCK;
> #endif

I was hoping to avoid forcing source-code changes, but something like
that might be the best solution. Anyone think it's unreasonable?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-11-12 18:31:44 Cursor estimated row count
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-11-12 17:24:34 Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload