Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
- Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Subject: Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload
- Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 12:44:23 -0500
- Message-id: <28450.1131817463@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> If we don't like imposing link time constraints, we could require
> people to include:
> #ifdef PG_MAGIC_BLOCK
> PG_MAGIC_BLOCK;
> #endif
I was hoping to avoid forcing source-code changes, but something like
that might be the best solution. Anyone think it's unreasonable?
regards, tom lane
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index