Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
- To: "Sander Steffann" <steffann(at)nederland(dot)net>
- Cc: "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:31:07 -0800
Folks, Thanks, all! Now, if only I could remember who asked me the question ... -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- From: Jim C. Nasby
- Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- References:
- FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- From: Josh Berkus
- Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- From: Sander Steffann
- FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- Prev by Date: Re: add_missing_from breaks existing views
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCHES] TODO Item - Add system view to show free
- Previous by thread: Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- Next by thread: Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- Indexes: