Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 15:10:33 -0400
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes: > At this stage, I am thinking this is best left for 8.2. It is > impossible for us to test it enough. Agreed --- the portability risks are way too high for 8.1. I see no reason not to try it during the 8.2 cycle though. regards, tom lane
- References:
- Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed
- Prev by Date: Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed
- Next by Date: Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed
- Previous by thread: Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed
- Next by thread: Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed
- Indexes: