Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
- Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:27:47 -0400
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes: > Are foreign keys on temp tables not allowed just because nobody requested > them, or because they're hard to do? You can have foreign keys between temp tables, just not between temp and permanent tables. The latter case is either fairly silly, or technically hard, depending on which direction you have in mind. regards, tom lane
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- From: Sander Steffann
- Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- References:
- FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- From: Josh Berkus
- FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- Prev by Date: 8.1 Release Candidate 1 Coming ...
- Next by Date: Re: 8.1 Release Candidate 1 Coming ...
- Previous by thread: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- Next by thread: Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- Indexes: