Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
- To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:34:11 -0700
Folks, Are foreign keys on temp tables not allowed just because nobody requested them, or because they're hard to do? -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- Prev by Date: Re: TODO for plpgsql: RETURN should accept arbitrary composite expressions
- Next by Date: 8.1 Release Candidate 1 Coming ...
- Previous by thread: TODO for plpgsql: RETURN should accept arbitrary composite expressions
- Next by thread: Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
- Indexes: