From: | Philip Yarra <philip(at)utiba(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: pl/pgsql breakage in 8.1b4? |
Date: | 2005-10-28 05:41:09 |
Message-ID: | 200510281541.10219.philip@utiba.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:03 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> Philip Yarra <philip(at)utiba(dot)com> writes:
> > Hmmm... is it feasible to make the error message a little more useful?
> > People who didn't use the old-style positional parameters might not
> > understand where $1 and $2 are coming from.
>
> Not sure how --- the arm's-length relationship between plpgsql and the
> main parser hurts us here.
Yeah, I had a suspicion the answer might be along those lines.
Well, here's a minor doco patch against HEAD to at least record this with the
Oracle PL/sql -> PL/pgSQL porting notes.
Regards, Philip.
-----------------
Utiba Pty Ltd
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Utiba mail server and is
believed to be clean.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
doc-plpgsql-oraport.patch | text/x-diff | 799 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Maxwell | 2005-10-28 05:57:38 | Re: enums |
Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2005-10-28 05:37:32 | Re: SOLVED Re: _penalty gist method invoked with one key |