Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
- Cc: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:40:32 -0400
- Message-id: <8582(dot)1130208032(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
"Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> writes: > OK, running the latest patch. Observations: > ... > I ran tests for about an hour, randomly killing/canceling backends > without any problems. Are we all comfortable that http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg01009.php is OK to apply? regards, tom lane
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
- From: Qingqing Zhou
- Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
- References:
- Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
- From: Merlin Moncure
- Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
- Prev by Date: Re: Seeing context switch storm with 10/13 snapshot of
- Next by Date: Re: [GENERAL] 'a' == 'a '
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
- Indexes: