Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
- From: PFC <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com>
- To: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, "Ron Peacetree" <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 23:45:10 +0200
Bulk loading speed is irrelevant here - that is dominated by parsing, whichwe have covered copiously (har har) previously and have sped up by 500%, which still makes Postgres < 1/2 the loading speed of MySQL.
Let's ask MySQL 4.0
LOAD DATA INFILE blah
0 errors, 666 warnings
SHOW WARNINGS;
not implemented. upgrade to 4.1 duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
- References:
- Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
- From: Luke Lonergan
- Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
- Prev by Date: Re: postgresql clustering
- Next by Date: Re: \d on database with a lot of tables is slow
- Previous by thread: Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
- Next by thread: Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
- Indexes: