Re: Found small issue with OUT params

[Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>]

Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com> writes:
> Please don't take this the wrong way, but don't you think even if a 
> single param is declared as OUT it should return the name of the OUT param?

Not really, because "create function foo (in x int, out y float)" is
supposed to have the same external behavior as "create function foo
(in x int) returns float".  I agree it's a bit of a judgment call, but
I do not see a case for changing it.

			regards, tom lane