Re: Database file compatability
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>
- Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Database file compatability
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:27:52 -0400
- Message-id: <1223(dot)1127878072(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
"Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> writes:
> I think all ALIGNOF macros should be checked.
There are no platforms for which ALIGNOF_SHORT is different from 2.
I don't think there are any platforms we care about where ALIGNOF_INT
is different from 4. The cases of interest are ALIGNOF_DOUBLE,
ALIGNOF_LONG, ALIGNOF_LONG_LONG_INT (note that MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF is
just the largest of these). In practice "long int" is the same type
as either "int" or "long long int", so ALIGNOF_LONG isn't a distinct
case either. What it comes down to is that MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF is
sufficient to tell the difference between the platforms we need to
deal with. If you have a counterexample, tell us about it.
regards, tom lane
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index