Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: roundoff problem in time datatype
- From: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: roundoff problem in time datatype
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:39:38 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <Pine(dot)LNX(dot)4(dot)44(dot)0509260935310(dot)28238-100000(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Tom Lane wrote: > Alternatively: why are we forbidding the value 24:00:00 anyway? Is > there a reason not to allow the hours field to exceed 23? One reason is because it's what the standard demand. Another is that it isn't a proper time, just like feb 31 isn't a proper date. -- /Dennis Björklund
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: roundoff problem in time datatype
- From: Jochem van Dieten
- Re: roundoff problem in time datatype
- From: Dave Cramer
- Re: roundoff problem in time datatype
- References:
- roundoff problem in time datatype
- From: Tom Lane
- roundoff problem in time datatype
- Prev by Date: vacuum analyze hanging
- Next by Date: "expected authentication request from server, but received..."
- Previous by thread: roundoff problem in time datatype
- Next by thread: Re: roundoff problem in time datatype
- Indexes: