Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Thomas F(dot) O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments
Date: 2005-05-12 05:23:17
Message-ID: 27064.1115875397@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Thomas F. O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com> writes:
> I think it's important to consider the perspective of both developers
> and users, and the internal views clearly creates issues for the
> developers.

FWIW, I don't see the issue as "internal vs external" at all. What's
bothering me is whether these views can be considered sufficiently
more stable and better designed than the physical system catalogs
to justify recommending that application designers should rely on
the views instead of the catalogs. That point doesn't seem to me
to have been proven. The recent arguments in favor seem to boil down to
"novices will find these easier to use", which is very possibly true,
but novices don't have the same needs as programs.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-05-12 05:32:09 Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-12 04:44:48 Re: New Contrib Build?