Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

[Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>]

Kris Jurka wrote:
> One thing that definitely would be nice would be to be able to combine 
> funds from various sponsors for various features.  Alone a company can't 
> spring for it, but by pooling resources it could get done.  This is a lot 
> tougher to coordinate and unless there is a complete spec in place 
> different sponsors will pull in different directions.  Other bounty type 
> schemes don't seem to produce results, largely from a lack of cash. 
> (Here's $500 for two weeks of work).
> 
> Anyone care to shed some light on how it works now?

I can tell you how I have done it.  If a company contacts me to add a
feature, I find the person I think is most qualified, check their
availability, and then get them in touch with the donor.  In some cases,
I coordinate the work, and actually funnel the money and guarantee that
the developer will be paid.  I can do that because I often have an
existing relationship with the funding company and the developer.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073