Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

PostgreSQL
| The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

Search for
  Advanced Search

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement


  • From: "Nicolai Petri (lists)" <lists(at)petri(dot)cc>
  • To: "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Kris Jurka" <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
  • Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
  • Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
  • Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 10:37:06 +0200
  • Message-id: <007c01c54d5f$d843a1b0$64070080(at)freedom>

Anyone interested in pooling funds for features should take a look at
http://people.freebsd.org/~phk/funding.html, which is about a FreeBSD
developer who offered to work full-time on developing some specific
features should enough people donate. Also worthy of mention is
http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/.
This was really a great idea and we (my company) also supported it because
we use freebsd as our primary os. We also use PostgreSQL as our primary db
so it would be more than likely that we would donate money for something
similar with postgresql if either :
 a) we can direct the money at one or more specific tasks
 or
 b) the tasks founded will be related to core postgresql features e.g.
    generel performance or other benefits that fits all.

I think that for certain key features there's probably a lot of people
who would fork over between $100 and $1000 towards getting a feature
completed.
Yes - without any promise I would probably be able to raise between $1000
and $3000 in a period of the next 3 months. I would definately try it
and I have multiple customers that have giving their intent on something
like this.

Improved replication might be a good example. Table
partitioning would absolutely be an example. If there was a means for
these people to donate money towards work being done on some feature,
it's very likely that large chunks of development time could be paid for
just from smaller shops, let alone places that can afford to toss $20k
towards the development of something.
I totally agree. In our preference list I would have the following tasks :
1)  IOT (Index Ordered Tables)
2)  Table partitioning
3)  Better multimaster replication framework
4)  Extending PostgreSQL's plugin support with additional hooks in the
     backend e.g. :
      - for adding new tablestore engines (like mysql can)
- for adding callbacks that get's called on transaction success/failure
        using SPI. (e.g. for housekeeping and cleanup)
5)  Adding parameter support for NOTIFY / LISTEN

Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel(at)decibel(dot)org

Nicolai Petri
COD, catpipe systems - denmark


Ps. sorry for the x-post - should this be moved to advocacy ?




Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Privacy Policy | PostgreSQL Archives hosted by Command Prompt, Inc. | Designed by tinysofa
Copyright © 1996 – 2008 PostgreSQL Global Development Group