Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

PostgreSQL
| The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

Search for
  Advanced Search

Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1


  • From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
  • To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
  • Subject: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
  • Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:15:18 -0400
  • Message-id: <m3ekctkz61(dot)fsf(at)knuth(dot)cbbrowne(dot)com>

Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org ("Marc G. Fournier") wrote:
> I know one person was talking about being able to target only those
> that pages that have changes, instead of the whole table ... but some
> sort of "load monitoring" that checks # of active connections and
> tries to find 'lulls'?

I have some "log table purging" processes I'd like to put in place; it
would be really slick to be able to get some statistics from the
system as to how busy the DB has been in the last little while.  

The nice, adaptive algorithm:

- Loop forever

  - Once a minute, evaluate how busy things seem, giving some metric X

   -> If X is "high" then purge 10 elderly tuples from table log_table
   -> If X is "moderate" then purge 100 elderly tuples from table
      log_table
   -> If X is "low" then purge 1000 elderly tuples from table
      log_table

The trouble is in measuring some form of "X."

Some reasonable approximations might include:
 - How much disk I/O was recorded in the last 60 seconds?
 - How many application transactions (e.g. - invoices or such) were 
   issued in the last 60 seconds (monitoring a sequence could be
   good enough).
-- 
output = reverse("gro.mca" "@" "enworbbc")
http://linuxfinances.info/info/slony.html
?OM ERROR



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Privacy Policy | PostgreSQL Archives hosted by Command Prompt, Inc. | Designed by tinysofa
Copyright © 1996 – 2008 PostgreSQL Global Development Group