Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1

["Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>]

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Bruno Wolff III wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:09:43 -0400,
>  Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
> > > > In the last exciting episode, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) wrote:
> > > > > o integrated auto-vacuum (Bruce)
> > >
> > > > If this can kick off a vacuum of a Very Large Table at an unfortunate
> > > > time, this can turn out to be a prety painful misfeature.
> > >
> > > [ shrug... ]  You'll always be able to turn it off if you don't want it.
> > > I'm not sure that we'll be ready to turn it on by default even in 8.1.
> >
> > Agreed.  It will just be there to turn on from postgresql.conf if you
> > want it, and we do have TODO information about keeping such an FSM for
> > recently expired pages.
>
> I think if we aren't finding problems in testing that it would be better
> to turn pg_autovacuum on by default. Vacuum is something the burns new
> users and having it one by default is going to cut down on surprises.

Except for the surprise of peridically having the system go unresponsive 
because it hit a large table, and that new user wondering what is wrong 
with postgresql that it just stalls seemingly randomly :(

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664