Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
- From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:48:42 -0700
- Message-id: <4270793A(dot)5050302(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Do companies want to write for Blue Hat PostgreSQL and Suza PostgreSQL
because that might be what happens if we don't stay organized? In fact,
it might have be happening already.
Well that depends... If the companies are writing for Pervasive
PostgreSQL I don't think they would have a problem with that ;).
And I do agree with you Bruce, it is happening already -- I don't think
there is any question in that.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions provider, Command Prompt, Inc.
24x7 support - 1.800.492.2240, programming, and consulting
Home of PostgreSQL Replicator, plPHP, plPerlNG and pgPHPToolkit
http://www.commandprompt.com / http://www.postgresql.org
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index