Re: Constant WAL replay
- From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- Cc: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, eg(at)cybertec(dot)at
- Subject: Re: Constant WAL replay
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:04:29 -0400 (EDT)
- Message-id: <200504252004(dot)j3PK4Tv06611(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> >
> > Joshua,
> >
> > This sounds interesting. If you don't use the WAL but a transaction log
> > shipping - what does it mean in terms of PostgreSQL? Do you create your
> > own transaction log?
>
> Yes.
>
> > What really interests me here: Where is you code located in order to
> > make sure that this things can work reliably?
>
> We are integrated into the PostgreSQL backend.
So they have to get a new PostgreSQL release from you for every minor
upgrade, I assume at no cost?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index