Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Constant WAL replay
- From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>
- To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
- Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, eg(at)cybertec(dot)at
- Subject: Re: Constant WAL replay
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:22:21 +0200
- Message-id: <426D436D(dot)1000604(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Neil Conway wrote:
Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:The idea: We are looking for a way to implement a synchronous single-master / multiple slaves systems. Meanwhile we are able to serialize / deserialize WAL records and send them to a group communication system which transports those records to the slave database.BTW, what is the benefit to using a GCS here? -Neil
currently i have used it because it is simple.at the moment we are just doing experiments to see how log information can be treated. shipping the data is not the problem - the real problem is getting it back in.
good ideas are welcome ;) best regards, hans -- Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig Schoengrabern 134, A-2020 Hollabrunn, Austria Tel: +43/664/393 39 74 www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at
- References:
- Constant WAL replay
- From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig
- Re: Constant WAL replay
- From: Neil Conway
- Constant WAL replay
- Prev by Date: Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
- Next by Date: Re: Constant WAL replay
- Previous by thread: Re: Constant WAL replay
- Next by thread: Re: Constant WAL replay
- Indexes: