Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction
- From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:47:14 +0800
- Message-id: <426C5A32(dot)90700(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
For all index types? Even lossy ones?Can't see that a lossy index would make any difference ...
OK, was just checking :)
- References:
- Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction
- From: Oleg Bartunov
- Re: Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction
- From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
- Re: Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction
- From: Tom Lane
- Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction
- Prev by Date: Re: Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction
- Next by Date: Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
- Previous by thread: Re: Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction
- Next by thread: CVS regression test problem
- Indexes: