Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Constant WAL replay
- From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
- To: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>
- Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, eg(at)cybertec(dot)at
- Subject: Re: Constant WAL replay
- Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 13:20:39 -0400
- Message-id: <20050424172039(dot)GD24170(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 08:10:34AM +0200, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote: > The idea: We are looking for a way to implement a synchronous > single-master / multiple slaves systems. > Meanwhile we are able to serialize / deserialize WAL records and send > them to a group communication system which transports those records to > the slave database. > This is not hard to do. In fact, I believe Command Prompt's Mammoth Replicator does exactly this. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>) "La victoria es para quien se atreve a estar solo"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Constant WAL replay
- From: Joshua D. Drake
- Re: Constant WAL replay
- References:
- Constant WAL replay
- From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig
- Constant WAL replay
- Prev by Date: Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
- Next by Date: Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
- Previous by thread: Re: Constant WAL replay
- Next by thread: Re: Constant WAL replay
- Indexes: