Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
1010 messages
25 April 2005
Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters Tom Lane (22:34)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Tom Lane (22:27)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Bruce Momjian (21:52)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Tom Lane (21:11)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Dave Held (21:00)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Andrew Dunstan (20:43)
Re: Constant WAL replay Joshua D. Drake (20:09)
Re: Constant WAL replay Hans-Jürgen Schönig (20:06)
Re: Constant WAL replay Bruce Momjian (20:04)
Re: Constant WAL replay Joshua D. Drake (19:59)
Re: Constant WAL replay Hans-Jürgen Schönig (19:29)
Re: Constant WAL replay Hans-Jürgen Schönig (19:25)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus (19:13)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus (19:08)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Simon Riggs (18:53)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Michael Paesold (17:51)
[proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters Brent Verner (17:32)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Bruce Momjian (17:30)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Dave Held (16:18)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Tom Lane (15:23)
Re: How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several transactions ? Tom Lane (15:11)
Re: How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several transactions ? Alvaro Herrera (12:41)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Jochem van Dieten (11:43)
How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several transactions ? Hannu Krosing (10:55)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Hannu Krosing (10:54)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Hannu Krosing (10:49)
Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Hannu Krosing (10:49)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Hannu Krosing (10:49)
How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several transactions ? Hannu Krosing (10:48)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Hannu Krosing (10:47)
How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several transactions ? Hannu Krosing (10:46)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Simon Riggs (09:01)
Re: simplify register_dirty_segment() Tom Lane (08:43)
simplify register_dirty_segment() Qingqing Zhou (08:16)
Re: Passwords in PSQL Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:39)
Re: Passwords in PSQL Gavin Sherry (07:37)
Passwords in PSQL Rafaqat Ali (06:36)
Re: CVS regression test problem Tom Lane (05:07)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Tom Lane (04:59)
Re: Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:47)
Re: Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction Tom Lane (02:45)
Re: Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:29)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Bruce Momjian (01:45)
Re: Constant WAL replay Bruce Momjian (01:18)
Re: Constant WAL replay Joshua D. Drake (00:06)
24 April 2005
Re: CVS regression test problem Oleg Bartunov (22:14)
Re: CVS regression test problem Alvaro Herrera (21:53)
CVS regression test problem Oleg Bartunov (21:18)
Re: Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction Oleg Bartunov (20:45)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Magnus Hagander (20:26)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen (19:46)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus (19:09)
Re: W[i/e]rd performance issue with 8.1cvs Josh Berkus (19:06)
Re: W[i/e]rd performance issue with 8.1cvs Tom Lane (19:01)
Re: W[i/e]rd performance issue with 8.1cvs Josh Berkus (18:53)
Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction Tom Lane (18:42)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus (18:31)
Re: Constant WAL replay Joshua D. Drake (18:01)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Andrew Dunstan (17:58)
Re: Constant WAL replay Alvaro Herrera (17:21)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Marko Ristola (17:09)
Re: Constant WAL replay Alvaro Herrera (17:07)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Tom Lane (16:01)
Re: Constant WAL replay Tom Lane (15:41)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen (14:09)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Neil Conway (13:36)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Bruce Momjian (12:50)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen (12:48)
I know I am behind Bruce Momjian (12:40)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Bruce Momjian (12:35)
Re: Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs Thomas Hallgren (12:05)
Re: Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs Oleg Bartunov (10:41)
Re: Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs John Hansen (10:03)
Re: Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs Thomas Hallgren (09:06)
Re: Constant WAL replay Klaus Naumann (07:59)
Re: Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs Oleg Bartunov (07:39)
Re: Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:23)
Re: Constant WAL replay Neil Conway (06:40)
Re: Constant WAL replay Tom Lane (06:28)
Constant WAL replay Hans-Jürgen Schönig (06:13)
Re: Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs Tom Lane (05:52)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Tom Lane (04:49)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Paul Tillotson (01:56)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Andrew Dunstan (00:33)
23 April 2005
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus (23:34)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Tom Lane (23:33)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Alvaro Herrera (23:25)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Tom Lane (22:27)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Ron Mayer (22:08)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Ron Mayer (22:00)
Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted Antoine Martin (14:00)
Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Stephen Frost (13:10)
Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted Stephen Frost (13:02)
Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Kevin Brown (06:28)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Bruce Momjian (04:03)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Russell Smith (03:44)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Alvaro Herrera (02:21)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Neil Conway (01:58)
22 April 2005
Re: slides on the optimizer elein (22:09)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (21:50)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Simon Riggs (21:46)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Andrew Dunstan (21:29)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Bruce Momjian (21:17)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (21:05)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Andrew Dunstan (20:49)
Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Josh Berkus (20:41)
Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Jan Wieck (20:36)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (20:30)
Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Tom Lane (20:02)
Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Tom Lane (19:53)
Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Stephen Frost (19:47)
Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Josh Berkus (19:37)
Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Jan Wieck (19:36)
Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Tom Lane (19:30)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Ron Mayer (19:16)
Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted Antoine Martin (19:11)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Bruce Momjian (18:58)
Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Josh Berkus (18:53)
Re: TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Josh Berkus (18:50)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (18:47)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Dave Held (18:39)
Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Jim C. Nasby (18:23)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Tom Lane (18:21)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Jim C. Nasby (18:18)
Re: Proposal for background vacuum full/cluster Jim C. Nasby (18:09)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Dann Corbit (18:08)
Re: Proposal for background vacuum full/cluster Jim C. Nasby (18:03)
Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Tom Lane (17:59)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Andrew Dunstan (17:45)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler Chuck McDevitt (17:35)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (17:23)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Bruce Momjian (17:14)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (17:10)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Alvaro Herrera (17:05)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (17:02)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Joshua D. Drake (16:42)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Hannu Krosing (16:25)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Tom Lane (15:56)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Jochem van Dieten (15:53)
Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Stephen Frost (15:53)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (15:45)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Bruce Momjian (15:40)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Alvaro Herrera (15:34)
possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Hannu Krosing (15:34)
possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Hannu Krosing (15:17)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Marc G. Fournier (15:17)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (15:10)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Tom Lane (14:59)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Marc G. Fournier (14:46)
Re: PQfmod and varchars Tom Lane (14:31)
Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (14:10)
Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Marc G. Fournier (13:56)
Re: slides on the optimizer Oleg Bartunov (13:44)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
pgsql-hackers 2005-04 Chronological Index (2/6)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 03:21:38 20121010 messages
- 26 April 2005
- Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Richard Huxton (14:08)
- Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Michael Paesold (12:22)
- Re: bitmapscan test, no success, again Pavel Stehule (12:06)
- Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Greg Sabino Mullane (11:43)
- bitmapscan test, no success, bs is not faster Pavel Stehule (11:20)
- Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future? apoc9009(at)yahoo(dot)de (09:45)
- Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future? Qingqing Zhou (09:27)
- Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future? apoc9009(at)yahoo(dot)de (08:34)
- Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules Neil Conway (06:48)
- Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules Tom Lane (06:37)
- Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules Neil Conway (06:10)
- Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules David Wheeler (06:06)
- Re: simplify register_dirty_segment() Qingqing Zhou (06:05)
- Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules Tom Lane (06:00)
- Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Mark Kirkwood (05:54)
- Re: simplify register_dirty_segment() Tom Lane (05:33)
- DO INSTEAD and conditional rules Neil Conway (05:31)
- Re: simplify register_dirty_segment() Qingqing Zhou (03:32)
- Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Bruce Momjian (03:24)
- Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Mark Kirkwood (03:14)
- Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:11)
- Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Bruce Momjian (01:52)
- Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:35)
- Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Dave Held (22:41)
- Re: Constant WAL replay Bruce Momjian (22:48)
- Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus (23:48)
- Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Tom Lane (22:16)