Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
pgsql-hackers 2005-04 Chronological Index (1/6)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 03:21:38 2012
1010 messages
01 May 2005
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Robert Treat (01:40)
pl/Python James William Pye (01:37)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Robert Treat (01:34)
30 April 2005
Re: Output functions with multiple arguments considered harmful elein (23:36)
Re: Output functions with multiple arguments considered James William Pye (23:26)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement David Fetter (21:40)
Re: Output functions with multiple arguments considered harmful Tom Lane (21:31)
Re: Output functions with multiple arguments considered harmful elein (21:22)
pg_locks needs a facelift Tom Lane (21:12)
Output functions with multiple arguments considered harmful Tom Lane (20:18)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Robert Treat (19:14)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (17:04)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (13:13)
Re: Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (13:05)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Rob Butler (12:54)
Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream Neil Conway (11:26)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Kris Jurka (10:05)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Nicolai Petri (lists) (08:37)
Re: Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake (06:36)
Re: Increased company involvement Jim C. Nasby (06:32)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Jim C. Nasby (06:29)
Re: Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake (06:21)
Re: Increased company involvement Jim C. Nasby (06:18)
Re: Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake (06:03)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Kris Jurka (05:47)
Re: Increased company involvement Tom Lane (04:13)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Matthew T. O'Connor (04:06)
Re: Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (03:42)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Marc G. Fournier (01:57)
SPI bug. Tzahi Fadida (00:26)
Re: performance of bitmap scans in nested loop joins Sergey E. Koposov (00:01)
29 April 2005
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Christopher Browne (22:50)
Re: Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan (21:53)
Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters Alvaro Herrera (19:33)
Re: performance of bitmap scans in nested loop joins Tom Lane (18:01)
Re: [GENERAL] Returning a RECORD, not SETOF RECORD Tom Lane (17:35)
Re: [GENERAL] Returning a RECORD, not SETOF RECORD Michael Fuhr (17:21)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Marc G. Fournier (16:35)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane (15:59)
Re: pg_restore stuck in a loop? Tom Lane (15:51)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Bruno Wolff III (15:50)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Marc G. Fournier (15:43)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Matthew T. O'Connor (15:38)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Bruno Wolff III (15:31)
Re: [GENERAL] Returning a RECORD, not SETOF RECORD Tom Lane (14:36)
Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters Tom Lane (14:17)
performance of bitmap scans in nested loop joins Sergey E. Koposov (14:17)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Bruce Momjian (14:09)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane (14:01)
Re: pg_restore stuck in a loop? Rod Taylor (13:33)
PseudoPartitioning and agregates Sokolov Yura (11:54)
Re: [GENERAL] Returning a RECORD, not SETOF RECORD Thomas Hallgren (06:29)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Christopher Browne (05:50)
Re: [PERFORM] Distinct-Sampling (Gibbons paper) for Postgres Josh Berkus (05:23)
Re: Distinct-Sampling (Gibbons paper) for Postgres a3a18850 (05:10)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (04:35)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement sharable row-level locks, and use them for foreign key Tom Lane (04:18)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Josh Berkus (03:13)
Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters Brent Verner (00:49)
28 April 2005
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Andy Astor (19:00)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Marko Ristola (17:45)
Re: [JDBC] Statement Timeout and Locking Markus Schaber (17:37)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Andreas Pflug (16:36)
Re: [JDBC] Statement Timeout and Locking Tom Lane (15:59)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Magnus Hagander (15:39)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Mischa Sandberg (15:21)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Robert Treat (15:12)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Rob Butler (14:28)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Bruno Wolff III (14:15)
Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters Tom Lane (14:00)
Feature freeze date for 8.1 Bruce Momjian (13:02)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (12:20)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Hannu Krosing (11:55)
Re: Increased company involvement Thomas Hallgren (07:35)
Re: pg_restore stuck in a loop? Tom Lane (06:12)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (05:56)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake (05:48)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD (05:46)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (05:30)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Christopher Kings-Lynne (05:25)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake (05:21)
Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (05:10)
Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future? Neil Conway (01:43)
Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future? Bruce Momjian (01:22)
Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future? Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:14)
Re: pg_restore stuck in a loop? Rod Taylor (01:03)
Re: Developer Community Juan Jose Costello Levien (00:54)
Re: PITR bad restore possibility? Rod Taylor (00:43)
Re: Developer Community Jim C. Nasby (00:22)
Re: PITR bad restore possibility? Tom Lane (00:14)
27 April 2005
Re: [PATCHES] [WIP] shared locks Tom Lane (23:05)
PITR bad restore possibility? Rod Taylor (22:47)
Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future? Hannu Krosing (22:43)
Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future? Josh Berkus (22:35)
Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future? Hannu Krosing (22:24)
Re: Behavior of shared/exclusive row locks Alvaro Herrera (22:14)
Re: Behavior of shared/exclusive row locks Tom Lane (21:51)
Re: Behavior of shared/exclusive row locks Alvaro Herrera (21:21)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Bruce Momjian (17:37)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Greg Stark (17:17)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Tom Lane (17:17)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Bruce Momjian (16:40)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Dave Held (15:48)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus (15:25)
Behavior of shared/exclusive row locks Tom Lane (15:19)
PITR and postmaster.pid Rod Taylor (14:37)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Dave Held (14:35)
Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters Brent Verner (14:12)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Andrew Dunstan (13:44)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Simon Riggs (13:17)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Robert Treat (12:32)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Greg Sabino Mullane (12:02)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Simon Riggs (07:48)
Re: bitmapscan test, no success, bs is not faster Pavel Stehule (06:27)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Greg Stark (05:59)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Mischa Sandberg (05:38)
Re: Disable large objects GUC Christopher Kings-Lynne (04:28)
Re: Disable large objects GUC Tom Lane (04:20)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Tom Lane (04:14)
Re: pg_restore stuck in a loop? Tom Lane (03:22)
Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters Tom Lane (03:00)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules David Wheeler (02:00)
Disable large objects GUC Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:48)
Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters Brent Verner (00:31)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Rod Taylor (00:19)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules Jan Wieck (00:03)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql John DeSoi (00:02)
26 April 2005
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Rod Taylor (23:13)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Greg Stark (23:03)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Dave Held (22:43)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules David Wheeler (22:06)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Gurmeet Manku (22:01)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules Tom Lane (21:58)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules Tom Lane (21:56)
Re: How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several transactions ? Tom Lane (21:54)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules David Wheeler (21:53)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules Rob Butler (21:43)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Andrew Dunstan (21:42)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Simon Riggs (21:06)
populating a table via the COPY command using C code. Mak, Jason (20:57)
Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future? Robert Treat (20:52)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus (20:40)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Simon Riggs (20:35)
Re: How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several Hannu Krosing (20:23)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules David Wheeler (20:19)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules David Wheeler (20:17)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules Tom Lane (19:35)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules Jan Wieck (19:14)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules Rob Butler (19:01)
pg_restore stuck in a loop? Rod Taylor (18:56)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules Tom Lane (18:20)
Re: bitmapscan test, no success, bs is not faster Oleg Bartunov (16:35)
Re: bitmapscan test, no success, bs is not faster Oleg Bartunov (16:32)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules David Wheeler (16:17)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules Tom Lane (15:56)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Tom Lane (15:52)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules David Wheeler (15:49)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Andrew Dunstan (15:47)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Tom Lane (15:20)
Re: bitmapscan test, no success, bs is not faster Tom Lane (15:15)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Andrew Dunstan (15:04)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Tom Lane (14:58)
Re: btree_gist regression tests failing in 8.0 branch? Teodor Sigaev (14:54)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Tom Lane (14:53)
btree_gist regression tests failing in 8.0 branch? Tom Lane (14:49)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in Philip Warner (14:48)
Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql Harald Fuchs (14:48)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Joshua D. Drake (14:44)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Tom Lane (14:35)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Michael Paesold (14:30)
Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Tom Lane (14:29)