subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)
Date: 2004-03-24 03:03:03
Message-ID: 20040323225825.W3456@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:

> Which brings me to another question .. has anybody considered using
> subversion instead of CVS ?

Why? not that I'm for a chance from something that isn't broken, but what
advantages does subversion give us over what we already have?

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-24 03:31:30 Re: linked list rewrite
Previous Message Wes Palmer 2004-03-24 02:39:42 Re: Solaris ecpg program doesn't work - pulling my hair

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Buttafuoco 2004-03-24 03:03:34 PANIC: hash table "Shared Buffer Lookup Table" corrupted
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-03-24 02:57:14 Re: pg_dump locks a table on dumping ... ?