Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Pl/Java - next step?
- From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
- To: "Thomas Hallgren" <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Pl/Java - next step?
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:14:09 +0100
- Message-id: <200402231714.09095.peter_e@gmx.net> <text/plain>
Thomas Hallgren wrote: > 1. Select Pl/Java_JNI. > 2. Select Pl/Java_remote > 3. Choose both and agree on the SQL + Java semantics > 4. Make the postmaster spawn threads rather than processes > (controversial? Nah :-) ) Option 5 (or 0) would be to use GCJ. This is likely to be the fastest and most lightweight solution, but perhaps not the most featureful.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pl/Java - next step?
- From: Thomas Hallgren
- Re: Pl/Java - next step?
- References:
- Pl/Java - next step?
- From: Thomas Hallgren
- Pl/Java - next step?
- Prev by Date: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it required?
- Next by Date: Re: Pl/Java - next step?
- Previous by thread: Re: Pl/Java - next step?
- Next by thread: Re: Pl/Java - next step?
- Indexes: