pgsql-hackers 2003-04 Thread Index (2/6)

Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Text Size: Normal / Large
Donate
Contact

Header And Logo

The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

pgsql-hackers 2003-04 Thread Index (2/6)

Last updated: Wed Jan 18 03:27:39 2012
1021 messages

Re: query optimization scenarios 17,701 times faster!!!, (continued)
- Re: query optimization scenarios 17,701 times faster!!! Robert Dyas (Thu 24 21:08)
EXECUTE INTO Peter Eisentraut (Wed 23 14:23)
linking problem with gcc-mingw Shi-Sen Chang (Wed 23 11:39)

Re: linking problem with gcc-mingw Hiroshi Saito (Wed 23 16:38)

Re: linking problem with gcc-mingw Shi-Sen Chang (Fri 25 08:34)

pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - The Conclusion Dave Page (Wed 23 11:14)
7.4 acl: what is a*r*w*d*? Andreas Pflug (Wed 23 08:30)

Re: 7.4 acl: what is a*r*w*d*? Rod Taylor (Wed 23 12:32)

elog/ereport syntax difficulties Tom Lane (Tue 22 20:21)
bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner (Tue 22 11:48)

Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Christopher Kings-Lynne (Tue 22 14:32)
Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Stephan Szabo (Tue 22 14:36)

Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Christopher Kings-Lynne (Wed 23 01:12)

Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Stephan Szabo (Wed 23 03:34)

Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Tom Lane (Tue 22 15:31)

Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner (Tue 22 15:51)

Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Tom Lane (Tue 22 16:08)

Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner (Tue 22 16:19)

Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Christopher Kings-Lynne (Wed 23 01:15)

Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner (Wed 23 01:28)

Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Tom Lane (Wed 23 04:14)
Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner (Wed 23 10:49)
Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Tom Lane (Wed 23 14:36)
Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner (Wed 23 14:50)
Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Tom Lane (Wed 23 15:29)
Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner (Wed 23 15:34)
Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Peter Eisentraut (Wed 23 17:59)
Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner (Thu 24 01:37)

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Tom Lane (Wed 23 16:02)

Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner (Wed 23 16:38)

Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Hannu Krosing (Wed 23 21:05)

FYI: away for the summer Neil Conway (Tue 22 06:00)
CLOSE command tag Neil Conway (Tue 22 05:18)

Re: CLOSE command tag Tom Lane (Tue 22 05:46)
Re: CLOSE command tag Peter Eisentraut (Tue 22 13:09)

Re: CLOSE command tag Neil Conway (Wed 23 01:30)

Re: CLOSE command tag Peter Eisentraut (Wed 23 17:59)

The main 'main() ' of postgresql. S - (Tue 22 05:15)

Re: The main 'main() ' of postgresql. Neil Conway (Tue 22 05:20)

Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Christopher Kings-Lynne (Tue 22 02:23)

Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Neil Conway (Tue 22 02:44)

Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Larry Rosenman (Tue 22 02:57)

Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Sean Chittenden (Tue 22 04:24)

Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Larry Rosenman (Tue 22 04:26)
Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Tom Lane (Tue 22 04:37)

Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Sean Chittenden (Tue 22 04:44)
Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Larry Rosenman (Tue 22 04:48)
Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Tom Lane (Tue 22 05:04)
Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Sean Chittenden (Tue 22 05:10)
Message not available
Message not available
Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Sean Chittenden (Tue 22 06:01)
Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Tom Lane (Tue 22 06:10)
Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Sean Chittenden (Tue 22 06:20)
Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Nigel J. Andrews (Tue 22 09:31)
Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Philip Warner (Tue 22 06:44)

Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Tom Lane (Tue 22 03:00)

Re: Bizarre 7.3.2 bug Christopher Kings-Lynne (Tue 22 03:10)

Dr. Codd Greg Sabino Mullane (Mon 21 13:47)
new version of tsearch V2 Oleg Bartunov (Mon 21 09:17)
TODO-list Dennis Björklund (Mon 21 05:17)

Re: TODO-list Tom Lane (Mon 21 06:25)

Re: TODO-list Dennis Björklund (Mon 21 10:46)
Re: TODO-list Hannu Krosing (Mon 21 14:05)
Re: TODO-list Hannu Krosing (Mon 21 14:06)

Re: TODO-list Andrew Overholt (Tue 22 14:31)

Re: How to write make rules for shared library and Cadili (Sun 20 09:06)
rename/unlink handling for Win32 Bruce Momjian (Sun 20 02:39)

Re: rename/unlink handling for Win32 Bruce Momjian (Sun 20 02:47)
Re: rename/unlink handling for Win32 Peter Eisentraut (Sun 20 16:15)

Priority queue of tuples in PostgreSQL source code. You Lun (Sat 19 22:35)
Problem while ordering Turkish chars Devrim GUNDUZ (Sat 19 11:00)

Re: Problem while ordering Turkish chars Tom Lane (Sat 19 15:49)

relID and tupleID S - (Sat 19 05:35)

Re: relID and tupleID Tom Lane (Sat 19 05:49)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: relID and tupleID S - (Sat 19 06:07)

There are advantages to having an odd name Tom Lane (Sat 19 02:53)

Re: There are advantages to having an odd name Hannu Krosing (Tue 22 19:34)

Re: There are advantages to having an odd name Bruce Momjian (Tue 22 19:37)

default locale considered harmful? (was Re: [GENERAL] Using index for "like 'ABC%'" type query) Tom Lane (Fri 18 14:48)

Re: default locale considered harmful? (was Re: [GENERAL] Bruce Momjian (Fri 18 15:07)
Re: default locale considered harmful? Tatsuo Ishii (Fri 18 22:41)
Re: default locale considered harmful? (was Re: [GENERAL] Peter Eisentraut (Sun 20 16:14)
Re: default locale considered harmful? (was Re: [GENERAL] Using index for "like 'ABC%'" type query) Andrew Sullivan (Sun 20 16:55)
Re: default locale considered harmful? (was Re: [GENERAL] Using Olleg Samojlov (Fri 25 12:04)

Foreign key performance Kevin Brown (Fri 18 05:11)

Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Stephan Szabo (Fri 18 05:30)

Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Tom Lane (Fri 18 06:06)

Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Stephan Szabo (Fri 18 06:25)

Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Stephan Szabo (Fri 18 14:47)

Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Tom Lane (Fri 18 14:51)
Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Stephan Szabo (Fri 18 15:13)
Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Stephan Szabo (Sat 19 19:03)
Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Tom Lane (Sat 19 20:58)
Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Stephan Szabo (Sun 20 06:56)
Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Stephan Szabo (Sun 20 16:04)
Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Tom Lane (Sun 20 17:09)
Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Kevin Brown (Mon 21 00:09)
Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Tom Lane (Mon 21 00:34)
Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Kevin Brown (Tue 22 11:44)
Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance Jan Wieck (Fri 25 19:53)

pg 7.3.2 assert statement fails. process terminated Thomas O'Dowd (Fri 18 02:07)

Re: pg 7.3.2 assert statement fails. process terminated Thomas O'Dowd (Fri 18 02:44)

Re: pg 7.3.2 assert statement fails. process terminated Tom Lane (Fri 18 06:03)

Re: pg 7.3.2 assert statement fails. process terminated Thomas O'Dowd (Fri 18 06:37)

Re: pg 7.3.2 assert statement fails. process terminated Tom Lane (Sun 20 17:41)

Note about upcoming instability in FE/BE protocol Tom Lane (Thu 17 22:23)

Re: Note about upcoming instability in FE/BE protocol Oliver Elphick (Fri 18 05:07)

Re: Note about upcoming instability in FE/BE protocol Tom Lane (Fri 18 05:49)

Re: Note about upcoming instability in FE/BE protocol mlw (Sat 19 13:31)

Re: Note about upcoming instability in FE/BE protocol Tom Lane (Sat 19 16:01)

Should libpq's environment settings affect the session default? Tom Lane (Thu 17 21:06)

Re: Should libpq's environment settings affect the session Bruce Momjian (Thu 17 21:16)

FE/BE Protocol, Tom? pgsql (Thu 17 17:41)

Re: FE/BE Protocol, Tom? Rod Taylor (Thu 17 17:45)

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Dave Page (Thu 17 15:26)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Dave Page (Thu 17 10:01)

Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Ben Clewett (Thu 17 11:42)

Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Ian Barwick (Thu 17 12:15)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Andrew Dunstan (Thu 17 12:18)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Andrew Sullivan (Thu 17 12:44)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Doug McNaught (Thu 17 16:38)

Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Bruce Momjian (Thu 17 16:40)

Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Peter Eisentraut (Thu 17 17:40)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Matthew T. O'Connor (Thu 17 18:46)

Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Ben Clewett (Tue 22 08:22)

Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Shridhar Daithankar (Tue 22 08:38)

Re: For the ametures. (related to 'Are we losing momentum?') pgsql (Tue 22 14:29)

Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing Matthew T. O'Connor (Tue 22 12:23)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane (Tue 22 15:18)

Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Tue 22 16:32)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane (Tue 22 16:51)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Wed 23 08:37)

Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Bruce Momjian (Thu 17 15:37)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Jon Jensen (Thu 17 17:38)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") scott.marlowe (Mon 21 16:47)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Dave Page (Thu 17 12:44)

New flex Oliver Elphick (Thu 17 06:54)

Re: New flex Tom Lane (Sun 20 18:18)

anyone here follow securityfocus.com? Robert Treat (Wed 16 18:50)

Re: anyone here follow securityfocus.com? Lamar Owen (Wed 16 19:00)

Redhat DB differences Rob Butler (Wed 16 17:42)

Re: Redhat DB differences Tom Lane (Wed 16 17:55)

Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Rob Butler (Wed 16 15:33)

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Dave Page (Wed 16 15:51)

Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Robert Treat (Wed 16 16:21)

Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane (Wed 16 17:29)

Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Robert Treat (Wed 16 18:32)

Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Rob Butler (Wed 16 20:55)
Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") greg (Wed 16 21:44)
Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane (Thu 17 03:10)
For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Ben Clewett (Thu 17 09:43)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane (Thu 17 14:35)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Kevin Brown (Fri 18 04:56)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane (Fri 18 05:56)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Kevin Brown (Fri 18 06:19)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing cbbrowne (Fri 18 12:32)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane (Fri 18 14:06)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Kevin Brown (Fri 18 22:06)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane (Sat 19 00:12)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Christopher Kings-Lynne (Sat 19 04:21)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Bruce Momjian (Sat 19 05:22)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane (Sat 19 05:27)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Christopher Kings-Lynne (Sat 19 09:23)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane (Sat 19 15:33)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Bruce Momjian (Sat 19 15:33)
Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Christopher Kings-Lynne (Sat 19 09:22)

Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Rob Butler (Wed 16 16:47)

Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Tom Lane (Wed 16 17:44)

Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?") Dave Page (Thu 17 07:45)

pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Dave Page (Wed 16 14:20)

Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Tom Lane (Wed 16 15:22)
Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Kevin Brown (Thu 17 02:35)

Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Tom Lane (Thu 17 03:39)

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Dave Page (Thu 17 07:27)
Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Dave Page (Thu 17 07:32)

Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Kevin Brown (Fri 18 09:58)

Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 cbbrowne (Fri 18 12:40)

Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 Kevin Brown (Fri 18 20:37)

Mail converted by MHonArc

Search

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

Site Navigation

Section Navigation

pgsql-hackers 2003-04 Thread Index (2/6)

Search archives
	Advanced Search