Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: LOCK SEQUENCE
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Mikhail Terekhov <terekhov(at)emc(dot)com>
- Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: LOCK SEQUENCE
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 17:40:08 -0400
- Message-id: <20144.1004046008@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
Mikhail Terekhov <terekhov(at)emc(dot)com> writes: > In my application I use 'LOCK seq'. In 7.0.2 it worked fine but in > 7.1.2 Postgres complains that 'seq is not a table'. Is this > (disabling to lock a sequences) an intended change? Hmm, it wasn't thought about too much, but why in the world would you want to lock a sequence? Seems like that destroys the point of using one. regards, tom lane
- References:
- LOCK SEQUENCE
- From: Mikhail Terekhov
- LOCK SEQUENCE
- Prev by Date: Re: [GENERAL] Using an SMP machine to make multiple indices on the same
- Next by Date: Cross Database Links
- Previous by thread: LOCK SEQUENCE
- Next by thread: [patch] helps fe-connect.c handle -EINTR more gracefully
- Indexes: