New Linux xfs/reiser file systems

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
Date: 2001-05-02 17:35:37
Message-ID: 200105021735.f42HZbY16618@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I was talking to a Linux user yesterday, and he said that performance
using the xfs file system is pretty bad. He believes it has to do with
the fact that fsync() on log-based file systems requires more writes.

With a standard BSD/ext2 file system, WAL writes can stay on the same
cylinder to perform fsync. Is that true of log-based file systems?

I know xfs and reiser are both log based. Do we need to be concerned
about PostgreSQL performance on these file systems? I use BSD FFS with
soft updates here, so it doesn't affect me.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message haresh 2001-05-02 19:23:17 strange table access error using PHP
Previous Message Kovacs Zoltan 2001-05-02 16:40:30 \c connects as another user instead I want in psql