Re: Re: [SQL] Re: pg_dump potential bug -UNIQUE INDEX on PG_SHADOW Dont!! HELP
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Marcin Kowalski <kowalski(at)datrix(dot)co(dot)za>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Re: [SQL] Re: pg_dump potential bug -UNIQUE INDEX on PG_SHADOW Dont!! HELP
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 19:14:59 -0500
- Message-id: <28038.986084099@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> test=> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX shadow_index ON pg_shadow (usename);
> CREATE
> test=> select * from pg_shadow;
> ERROR: Index 'pg_shadow_sysid_index' does not exist
> test=> \q
> $ psql test
> psql: FATAL 1: Index 'pg_shadow_name_index' does not exist
> $
> Notice the user wanted an index named shadow_index, but the error
> mentioned is pg_shadow_name_index.
What's failing is catcache lookups on pg_shadow. The catcache has table
entries that claim that there are indexes on pg_shadow(usename) and
pg_shadow(usesysid). The system would not work at all, except that
catcache's use of these indexes is defeated by sanity-check code that
notices that relhasindex is FALSE for pg_shadow (line 880 of
catcache.c).
As soon as you create an index on pg_shadow, relhasindex becomes TRUE
and catcache.c starts trying to use these nonexistent indexes for
routine operations like ACL permissions checks. So, nothing works
anymore.
We ought to create those indexes someday ;-)
regards, tom lane
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index