• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
  • Developer lists
    • pgsql-cluster-hackers
    • pgsql-committers
    • pgsql-hackers
    • pgsql-rrreviewers
    • pgsql-testers
    • pgsql-www
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-hackers 2001-01 Thread Index (1/9)

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• [no subject] Unknown (Wed 18 03:34)
• [no subject] Unknown (Wed 18 03:34)
• [no subject] Unknown (Wed 18 03:34)
• [no subject] Unknown (Wed 18 03:34)
• [no subject] Unknown (Wed 18 03:34)
• SF company wants to hire pgsql hacker Bruce Momjian (Wed 31 20:43)
• ERROR: "Database 'products', OID nnn, has disappeared from pg_database" Barnes, Sandy (Sandra) (Wed 31 18:29)
• AW: AW: Like vs '=' bug with indexing Zeugswetter Andreas SB (Wed 31 13:07)
• Re: AW: AW: Like vs '=' bug with indexing m w (Wed 31 13:18)
• RE: 7.1 question Magnus Hagander (Wed 31 10:19)
• AW: Like vs '=' bug with indexing Zeugswetter Andreas SB (Wed 31 08:30)
• pg_shadow overusage Rod Taylor (Tue 30 19:24)
• Re: pg_shadow overusage Rod Taylor (Tue 30 20:01)
• Like vs '=' bug with indexing m w (Tue 30 18:48)
• I'm off Jan Wieck (Tue 30 16:23)
• grant privileges to a database Martin A. Marques (Tue 30 13:10)
• Re: grant privileges to a database Martin A. Marques (Wed 31 18:04)
• Re: [GENERAL] Re: grant privileges to a database Michael Fork (Wed 31 18:53)
• Re: [GENERAL] Re: grant privileges to a database Martin A. Marques (Wed 31 19:44)
• Message not available
  • Re: [GENERAL] Re: grant privileges to a database Martin A. Marques (Wed 31 22:20)
• Re: [GENERAL] Trouble porting postgreSQL to WinNT Peter T Mount (Tue 30 09:15)
• Re: Re: [GENERAL] Trouble porting postgreSQL to WinNT Barry Lind (Tue 30 17:25)
• Re: Re: [GENERAL] Trouble porting postgreSQL to WinNT Fred Yankowski (Tue 30 20:07)
• Re: Re: [GENERAL] Trouble porting postgreSQL to WinNT Peter Mount (Tue 30 21:36)
• How to modify type in table? Jaruwan Laongmal (Tue 30 03:17)
• Like vs '=' m w (Tue 30 02:54)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: Like vs '=' m w (Tue 30 13:01)
• NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres)) Karel Zak (Mon 29 22:37)
• Book enters second printing Bruce Momjian (Mon 29 21:54)
• 7.1beta4 bug creating a certain table Kovacs Zoltan (Mon 29 21:07)
• Re: 7.1beta4 bug creating a certain table Tom Lane (Mon 29 22:33)
• Re: 7.1beta4 bug creating a certain table Kovacs Zoltan (Tue 30 16:57)
• Re: 7.1beta4 bug creating a certain table Stephan Szabo (Tue 30 18:20)
• Size of TODO.detail Bruce Momjian (Mon 29 17:52)
• Re: Size of TODO.detail Lamar Owen (Mon 29 19:31)
• Re: Size of TODO.detail Bruce Momjian (Tue 30 17:20)
• Re: Size of TODO.detail Lamar Owen (Tue 30 20:31)
• AW: Shouldn't this be an error? Zeugswetter Andreas SB (Mon 29 17:04)
• Re: AW: Shouldn't this be an error? Tom Lane (Mon 29 17:30)
• Re: AW: Shouldn't this be an error? Bruce Momjian (Mon 29 17:44)
• Re: AW: Shouldn't this be an error? Bruce Momjian (Mon 29 17:45)
• Shouldn't this be an error? Vince Vielhaber (Mon 29 16:21)
• Re: Shouldn't this be an error? Tom Lane (Mon 29 16:44)
• Re: Shouldn't this be an error? Bruce Momjian (Mon 29 16:58)
• Security hole in PL/pgSQL Jan Wieck (Mon 29 14:57)
• Re: Security hole in PL/pgSQL Tom Lane (Mon 29 15:57)
• Re: Security hole in PL/pgSQL Jan Wieck (Mon 29 16:19)
• Re: Security hole in PL/pgSQL KuroiNeko (Mon 29 17:07)
• Re: Security hole in PL/pgSQL Dominic J. Eidson (Mon 29 17:46)
• Re: Security hole in PL/pgSQL KuroiNeko (Mon 29 20:01)
• Re: Security hole in PL/pgSQL Jan Wieck (Mon 29 18:05)
• Re: Security hole in PL/pgSQL KuroiNeko (Mon 29 16:46)
• PostgreSQL v7.1BETA4 Bundled and Available ... The Hermit Hacker (Mon 29 14:05)
• Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL v7.1BETA4 Bundled and Available ... Tom Lane (Mon 29 15:51)
• Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL v7.1BETA4 Bundled and Available ... The Hermit Hacker (Tue 30 03:26)
• Emergency case: Postgres problems Jaruwan Laongmal (Mon 29 11:44)
• Re: Emergency case: Postgres problems Jan Wieck (Mon 29 19:23)
• 7.1beta4 RPMs. Lamar Owen (Mon 29 07:36)
• Re: 7.1beta4 RPMs. Lamar Owen (Mon 29 07:51)
• scan.l simplifications Robert B. Easter (Mon 29 07:31)
• Re: scan.l simplifications Tom Lane (Mon 29 15:03)
• Can PyGreSQL be updated? Oliver Elphick (Mon 29 06:53)
• Re: Can PyGreSQL be updated? Bruce Momjian (Mon 29 16:30)
• Beta4 available ... The Hermit Hacker (Mon 29 03:03)
• Re: Beta4 available ... Lamar Owen (Mon 29 04:02)
• Development of ISO19100 support in PG Franck Martin (Sun 28 23:05)
• Re: [ADMIN] Controlling user table creation Oliver Elphick (Sun 28 21:25)
• Re: [ADMIN] Controlling user table creation Peter Eisentraut (Sun 28 22:02)
• BLOB HOWTO?? Olivier PRENANT (Sun 28 19:59)
• Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Martin A. Marques (Mon 29 12:51)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Olivier PRENANT (Mon 29 11:17)
• Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Bruce Momjian (Mon 29 16:37)
• Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Olivier PRENANT (Mon 29 17:33)
• Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Bruce Momjian (Mon 29 17:42)
• Re: [SQL] Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Jan Wieck (Mon 29 18:05)
• Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Bruce Momjian (Mon 29 16:37)
• Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Jan Wieck (Mon 29 18:05)
• Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Jan Wieck (Mon 29 19:04)
• Re: BLOB HOWTO?? Franck Martin (Tue 30 10:49)
• plan for running postmaster directly as NT service Fred Yankowski (Sat 27 14:49)
• Re: plan for running postmaster directly as NT service Tom Lane (Sat 27 16:03)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• RE: plan for running postmaster directly as NT service Magnus Hagander (Sat 27 15:58)
• Ungraceful handling of fatal flex errors Peter Eisentraut (Sat 27 14:17)
• Re: Ungraceful handling of fatal flex errors Tom Lane (Sat 27 16:15)
• Message not available
  • Re: Ungraceful handling of fatal flex errors Tom Lane (Mon 29 14:44)
  • Re: Ungraceful handling of fatal flex errors dom (Mon 29 19:26)
• wrong query plan in 7.1beta3 Kovacs Zoltan (Sat 27 14:06)
• Re: wrong query plan in 7.1beta3 Peter Eisentraut (Sat 27 14:37)
• Re: wrong query plan in 7.1beta3 Kovacs Zoltan (Sat 27 15:46)
• Re: wrong query plan in 7.1beta3 Tom Lane (Sat 27 16:21)
• reorder INSERT firing in rules Bruce Momjian (Sat 27 05:49)
• Which version? Sasha Pachev (Sat 27 01:08)
• Re: Which version? The Hermit Hacker (Sat 27 02:06)
• Re: Which version? Sasha Pachev (Sat 27 17:04)
• Re: Which version? The Hermit Hacker (Sat 27 07:22)
• Re: Which version? Vince Vielhaber (Sat 27 14:09)
• Re: Which version? Bruce Momjian (Sat 27 18:05)
• Re: SourceForge & Postgres (fwd) Tim Perdue (Sat 27 01:07)
• Re: Re: SourceForge & Postgres (fwd) Bruce Momjian (Sat 27 04:25)
• Re: Re: SourceForge & Postgres (fwd) Tom Lane (Sat 27 06:07)
• pg_dump -c database problem Rod Taylor (Sat 27 01:01)
• Re: pg_dump -c database problem Philip Warner (Sat 27 01:34)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: pg_dump -c database problem Philip Warner (Sat 27 12:36)
• Sure enough, the lock file is gone Peter Eisentraut (Fri 26 20:09)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian (Fri 26 20:18)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Ross J. Reedstrom (Fri 26 20:24)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Jan Wieck (Fri 26 20:40)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Peter Eisentraut (Fri 26 20:57)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Jan Wieck (Fri 26 21:56)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Guenter (Sat 27 05:45)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Oliver Elphick (Sat 27 12:29)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian (Sat 27 18:17)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian (Sat 27 04:53)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Peter Eisentraut (Fri 26 20:58)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane (Fri 26 21:49)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane (Sat 27 00:06)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian (Sat 27 04:55)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Ross J. Reedstrom (Mon 29 16:44)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone GB Clark II (Sat 27 11:12)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Alfred Perlstein (Fri 26 20:49)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Florent Guillaume (Sat 27 17:35)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen (Sat 27 19:10)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone The Hermit Hacker (Sat 27 19:16)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen (Sat 27 19:29)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Peter Eisentraut (Sat 27 19:51)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen (Sat 27 19:57)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane (Sat 27 20:25)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Florent Guillaume (Sat 27 23:35)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Trond Eivind Glomsrød (Sun 28 17:49)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane (Sun 28 18:22)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen (Sun 28 20:55)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Trond Eivind Glomsrød (Sun 28 21:07)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen (Sun 28 21:41)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Peter Eisentraut (Sun 28 22:14)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen (Sun 28 22:26)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane (Sun 28 22:59)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen (Sun 28 23:14)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen (Sun 28 23:30)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane (Mon 29 01:00)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane (Sun 28 22:58)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian (Sun 28 23:54)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane (Sun 28 22:53)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen (Sun 28 23:02)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane (Sun 28 22:47)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Trond Eivind Glomsrød (Sun 28 22:59)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane (Sun 28 23:06)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Trond Eivind Glomsrød (Sun 28 23:44)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Oliver Elphick (Sun 28 21:38)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen (Sun 28 23:20)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Trond Eivind Glomsrød (Sun 28 23:38)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane (Mon 29 01:11)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone The Hermit Hacker (Mon 29 01:40)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen (Mon 29 02:50)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian (Mon 29 03:04)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen (Mon 29 04:46)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian (Mon 29 05:57)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen (Mon 29 06:32)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane (Mon 29 06:44)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen (Mon 29 07:12)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane (Mon 29 07:34)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen (Mon 29 07:48)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane (Mon 29 04:11)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian (Mon 29 04:24)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone The Hermit Hacker (Mon 29 04:36)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian (Mon 29 04:40)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane (Mon 29 04:43)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian (Mon 29 04:44)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane (Mon 29 03:47)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Oliver Elphick (Mon 29 06:29)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Dominic J. Eidson (Mon 29 06:34)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Oliver Elphick (Mon 29 06:50)
• Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Alessio Bragadini (Sun 28 18:31)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Oliver Elphick (Sat 27 23:49)
• Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane (Sun 28 00:07)
• postmaster -S will not print an error if pid file exists Peter Eisentraut (Fri 26 18:56)
• Re: postmaster -S will not print an error if pid file exists Tom Lane (Fri 26 21:03)
• Re: postmaster -S will not print an error if pid file exists Tom Lane (Fri 26 23:23)
• AW: Open 7.1 items Zeugswetter Andreas SB (Fri 26 17:52)
• Re: AW: Open 7.1 items Tom Lane (Fri 26 21:30)
• Hardwired MAXBACKENDS limit could be history Tom Lane (Fri 26 16:28)

---

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc