Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
1304 messages
26 October 2000
Re: [GENERAL] A rare error Kevin O'Gorman (23:37)
Re: more multibyte/After TGL... Tom Lane (23:24)
Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane (23:15)
Foreign key references now fails with inherited columns Oliver Elphick (21:42)
Re: --enable-multibyte dies (UnixWare 7.1.1)/Current Sources Oliver Elphick (21:26)
pgcrypto 0.2 Marko Kreen (20:59)
Simple question about Postgress rule system and docs for it . Vic (20:47)
Re: Idea: cross-check versions during initdb Bruce Momjian (19:50)
Re: Idea: cross-check versions during initdb Larry Rosenman (18:42)
more multibyte/After TGL... Larry Rosenman (18:36)
Re: Re: Add support for <xti.h> Peter Eisentraut (16:29)
Idea: cross-check versions during initdb Tom Lane (15:42)
Re: DBD::Pg::st execute failed: ERROR Stephan Szabo (15:12)
Re: sanity of using -current? Tom Lane (15:05)
Re: Re: libpq needs -lsocket on UnixWare Peter Eisentraut (14:58)
Re: --enable-multibyte dies (UnixWare 7.1.1)/Current Sources Tom Lane (14:51)
--enable-multibyte dies (UnixWare 7.1.1)/Current Sources Larry Rosenman (12:07)
Re: Postgres Question Philip Warner (11:54)
Re: AW: AW: BLERe: AW: AW: relation ### modifiedwhile in use Hiroshi Inoue (11:53)
Re: Unneccessary cmax in heap tuple ? devik (11:51)
Re: embedded sql with indicators in other DBs Christof Petig (11:51)
sanity of using -current? Alex Pilosov (04:09)
Re: [BUGS] bug in views/aggregates Tom Lane (03:01)
25 October 2000
Postgres Question Jeff Tucker (22:57)
DBD::Pg::st execute failed: ERROR andres mackiewicz (22:57)
Re: [Fwd: [CORE SDI ADVISORY] MySQL weak authentication] Marko Kreen (21:29)
Re: [Fwd: [CORE SDI ADVISORY] MySQL weak authentication] Marko Kreen (21:20)
Re: failed runcheck Patrick Welche (20:22)
Re: --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/perl? Bruce Momjian (20:12)
Re: --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/perl? Peter Eisentraut (18:54)
Re: --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/perl? Larry Rosenman (18:26)
Re: --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/perl? Tom Lane (18:20)
Re: failed runcheck Tom Lane (18:18)
Re: --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/perl? Bruce Momjian (18:18)
Re: Unneccessary cmax in heap tuple ? Tom Lane (18:04)
Re: [Fwd: [CORE SDI ADVISORY] MySQL weak authentication] Lamar Owen (17:56)
Re: failed runcheck Ross J. Reedstrom (17:52)
Re: libpq needs -lsocket on UnixWare Larry Rosenman (17:20)
Re: --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/perl? Larry Rosenman (16:50)
Re: length coerce for bpchar is broken since 7.0 Tom Lane (16:49)
Re: [GENERAL] A rare error Tom Lane (16:28)
Re: [Fwd: [CORE SDI ADVISORY] MySQL weak authentication] Bruce Guenter (16:27)
Re: libpq needs -lsocket on UnixWare Peter Eisentraut (16:21)
Re: --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/perl? Tom Lane (16:10)
Re: --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/perl? Bruce Momjian (16:09)
Re: Re: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for lar ge objects Tom Lane (15:50)
Re: Bogus-looking SSL code in postmaster wait loop Tom Lane (15:42)
Re: 7.0.x RPMs Lamar Owen (15:33)
7.0.x RPMs Thomas Lockhart (15:05)
RE: Re: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for lar ge objects Magnus Hagander (15:02)
RE: Bogus-looking SSL code in postmaster wait loop Magnus Hagander (14:58)
Re: --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/perl? Peter Eisentraut (14:35)
Re: Mailing list archives available? Vince Vielhaber (14:06)
Re: AW: AW: BLERe: AW: AW: relation ### modified while in use Philip Warner (14:01)
Re: looks like we forgot something... Larry Rosenman (10:46)
Re: Unneccessary cmax in heap tuple ? Hiroshi Inoue (10:30)
Re: Unneccessary cmax in heap tuple ? devik (10:18)
Re: Unneccessary cmax in heap tuple ? Hiroshi Inoue (09:47)
--with-perl=/path/to/prefered/perl? Larry Rosenman (09:45)
Re: Re: Add support for <xti.h> Pete Forman (09:37)
Re: Re: how to access backend pid from libpq ? Hannu Krosing (08:35)
AW: AW: BLERe: AW: AW: relation ### modified while in u se Zeugswetter Andreas SB (07:36)
Re: AW: BLERe: AW: AW: relation ### modified whilein use Hiroshi Inoue (06:38)
Unneccessary cmax in heap tuple ? devik (06:30)
Re: Two-phase commit devik (06:30)
Re: AW: BLERe: AW: AW: relation ### modified while in use Philip Warner (05:47)
Re: Fallback behavior for "UNKNOWN" types -- proposed change Thomas Lockhart (03:20)
Re: length coerce for bpchar is broken since 7.0 Tatsuo Ishii (01:14)
Re: relation ### modified while in use Hiroshi Inoue (01:10)
24 October 2000
Re: [PATCHES] binary operators on integers Tom Lane (21:30)
Re: Re: how to access backend pid from libpq ? Tom Lane (21:24)
Re: [PATCHES] add darwin/osxpb support to cvs Bruce Hartzler (21:16)
Re: Two-phase commit richard excite (20:58)
Re: Fallback behavior for "UNKNOWN" types -- proposed change Tom Lane (20:52)
looks like we forgot something... Larry Rosenman (19:42)
Re: [PATCHES] add darwin/osxpb support to cvs Peter Eisentraut (18:40)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam (xact.c xlog.c xlogutils.c) Peter Eisentraut (18:16)
RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam (xact.c xlog.c xlogutils.c) Mikheev, Vadim (17:01)
Re: relation ### modified while in use Vadim Mikheev (16:10)
Re: Re: Add support for <xti.h> Peter Eisentraut (16:05)
Re: regress issues: UW7.1.1/PG7.1dev/GCC Peter Eisentraut (16:02)
Re: how to access backend pid from libpq ? Tom Lane (15:32)
Re: Re: Add support for <xti.h> Tom Lane (15:07)
Re: Re: Add support for <xti.h> Tom Lane (14:37)
[Fwd: [CORE SDI ADVISORY] MySQL weak authentication] Lamar Owen (14:25)
Fallback behavior for "UNKNOWN" types -- proposed change Thomas Lockhart (14:08)
RE: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects Peter Mount (13:19)
Re: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects Tom Lane (12:44)
Re: Mailing list archives available? The Hermit Hacker (12:29)
Re: how to access backend pid from libpq ? Hannu Krosing (12:07)
how to access backend pid from libpq ? Hannu Krosing (11:53)
Re: libpq needs -lsocket on UnixWare KuroiNeko (11:02)
Two-phase commit devik (10:52)
Re: Mailing list archives available? Vince Vielhaber (10:19)
AW: AW: AW: BLERe: AW: AW: relation ### modified while in use Zeugswetter Andreas SB (10:16)
Re: AW: AW: BLERe: AW: AW: relation ### modified while in use Hiroshi Inoue (10:03)
AW: AW: relation ### modified while in use Zeugswetter Andreas SB (09:52)
AW: AW: BLERe: AW: AW: relation ### modified while in u se Zeugswetter Andreas SB (09:42)
Re: Re: Add support for <xti.h> Pete Forman (09:40)
Re: AW: BLERe: AW: AW: relation ### modified while in use Hiroshi Inoue (09:29)
AW: BLERe: AW: AW: relation ### modified while in use Zeugswetter Andreas SB (09:18)
RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects Peter Mount (09:09)
AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: relation ### modified while in use Zeugswetter Andreas SB (08:54)
Re: Mailing list archives available? The Hermit Hacker (03:35)
Mailing list archives available? Krzysztof Kowalczyk (03:27)
libpq needs -lsocket on UnixWare Larry Rosenman (02:59)
Re: relation ### modified while in use Hiroshi Inoue (02:07)
Re: TODO updates Bruce Momjian (01:59)
JDBC now needs updates for large objects Tom Lane (01:57)
TODO updates Tom Lane (01:54)
RE: relation ### modified while in use Mikheev, Vadim (01:35)
Re: relation ### modified while in use Hiroshi Inoue (00:50)
BLERe: AW: AW: relation ### modified while in use Hiroshi Inoue (00:18)
Re: relation ### modified while in use Hiroshi Inoue (00:01)
23 October 2000
Re: foreign key introduces unnecessary locking ? Vadim Mikheev (22:33)
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/test/regress/expected (plpgsql.out inet.out foreign_key.out errors.out) Vadim Mikheev (22:33)
Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge is hiring! Dominic J. Eidson (22:01)
Re: Navigating time-warps in the CVS tree (was re the rule system) Tom Lane (21:22)
Re: INHERITS doesn't offer enough functionality Chris (21:13)
Re: foreign key introduces unnecessary locking ? Vadim Mikheev (21:06)
Re: INHERITS doesn't offer enough functionality Marten Feldtmann (20:33)
Re: UnixWare 7.1.1b FS Larry Rosenman (20:33)
Errors on restoring a dumpall Kevin O'Gorman (19:28)
UDK.... Larry Rosenman (19:20)
Re: Navigating time-warps in the CVS tree (was re the rule system) Kevin O'Gorman (18:09)
Re: AW: AW: relation ### modified while in use Philip Warner (16:32)
Re: Add support for <xti.h> Tom Lane (16:32)
Re: AW: AW: relation ### modified while in use Tom Lane (16:29)
Re: foreign key introduces unnecessary locking ? Jan Wieck (16:11)
Re: AW: relation ### modified while in use Vadim Mikheev (16:07)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
pgsql-hackers 2000-10 Chronological Index (2/8)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 03:35:30 20121304 messages
- 27 October 2000
- Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane (20:14)
- (forw) Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman (20:11)
- Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane (20:07)
- Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Lamar Owen (20:04)
- Re:RPM dependencies (Was: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)) Lamar Owen (20:03)
- Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Alex Pilosov (19:55)
- Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Lamar Owen (19:51)
- Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman (19:46)
- Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Alex Pilosov (19:44)
- Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Trond Eivind Glomsrød (19:42)
- Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Lamar Owen (19:31)
- Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane (19:25)
- Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Bruce Momjian (19:21)
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Bruce Momjian (19:16)
- Re: Idea: cross-check versions during initdb Tom Lane (19:12)
- Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Peter Eisentraut (19:11)
- Re: Idea: cross-check versions during initdb Peter Eisentraut (19:05)
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Trond Eivind Glomsrød (19:03)
- Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Trond Eivind Glomsrød (18:57)
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Trond Eivind Glomsrød (18:54)
- Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c) Ross J. Reedstrom (17:41)
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Bruce Momjian (17:05)
- Mailing List Slowdowns ... The Hermit Hacker (16:42)
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Lamar Owen (16:34)
- LIMIT in DECLARE CURSOR: request for comments Tom Lane (16:18)
- Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman (16:13)
- Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman (16:08)
- Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Bruce Momjian (15:58)
- Re: Select syntax (broken in current CVS tree) Tom Lane (15:20)
- Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman (14:55)
- Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Tom Lane (14:54)
- Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman (14:51)
- Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane (14:49)
- Re: more multibyte/After TGL... Larry Rosenman (12:27)
- Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c) Philip Warner (10:21)
- Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c) Philip Warner (10:20)
- Re: [SQL] renaming columns... danger? Grant Finnemore (08:28)
- Re: Re: [GENERAL] A rare error Ian Lance Taylor (07:50)
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Bruce Momjian (04:55)
- Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Lamar Owen (04:51)
- PostgreSQL article in Linux Journal Nov 2000 Lamar Owen (04:51)
- Re: more multibyte/After TGL... Tatsuo Ishii (02:31)
- Re: Foreign key references now fails with inherited columns Stephan Szabo (01:25)
- Select syntax (broken in current CVS tree) Kevin O'Gorman (01:05)
- Re: Re: [GENERAL] A rare error Tom Lane (00:49)
- Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR The Hermit Hacker (00:19)
- Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman (23:49)
- bug in views/aggregates Kovacs Zoltan Sandor (22:58)
- Bogus-looking SSL code in postmaster wait loop Tom Lane (22:04)
- Re: [ANNC][RFC] crypto hashes for PostgreSQL 7.0, 7.1 Horst Herb (23:15)