Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
284 messages
01 April 2000
[6.5.3] first spinlock problem I've ever noticed ... The Hermit Hacker (01:43)
31 March 2000
Re: New config.{sub|guess} Peter Eisentraut (22:05)
Re: Regression tests Don Baccus (20:48)
Re: 6.5.0 datetime bug? Thomas Lockhart (16:43)
Re: 6.5.0 datetime bug? Maarten Boekhold (15:41)
procedure returns a tuple Karel Zak (15:33)
Re: 6.5.0 datetime bug? Thomas Lockhart (15:26)
Re: 6.5.0 datetime bug? Thomas Lockhart (14:48)
Re: Regression tests Lamar Owen (14:47)
Re: pgAccess change Vince Vielhaber (14:45)
Re: pgAccess change Bruce Momjian (14:44)
Re: Docs refreshed Thomas Lockhart (14:39)
Re: pgAccess change Lamar Owen (14:37)
Re: Regress test updates: status report Lamar Owen (14:34)
Re: pgAccess change Bruce Momjian (14:28)
Re: pgAccess change Lamar Owen (14:24)
Regression tests Bruce Momjian (14:18)
Re: Call for platform reports Bruce Momjian (14:14)
Re: pgAccess change Bruce Momjian (14:06)
pgAccess change Lamar Owen (13:56)
RE: Call for platform reports Horák Daniel (13:51)
RE: ...copy hack Magnus Hagander (12:43)
RE: slow join on postgresql6.5 Don Baccus (12:13)
Re: ...copy hack Daniele Medri (11:43)
Function tables from my book Bruce Momjian (11:41)
Re: ...copy hack Daniele Medri (10:32)
Re: BIT datatype Michael Meskes (10:02)
RE: slow join on postgresql6.5 Hiroshi Inoue (09:59)
Postresql & triggers Sergey V. Mikheev (09:17)
Re: 6.5.0 datetime bug? gravity (08:24)
Re: BIT datatype Thomas Lockhart (06:12)
Regress test updates: status report Tom Lane (06:01)
Re: BIT datatype Michael Meskes (05:45)
Re: slow join on postgresql6.5 Don Baccus (00:24)
Re: slow join on postgresql6.5 Don Baccus (00:24)
Re: Release schedule (was Re: Improvement in SET commandsyntax) Bruce Momjian (00:03)
30 March 2000
Docs refreshed Thomas Lockhart (22:43)
Re: Release schedule (was Re: Improvement in SET commandsyntax) Vince Vielhaber (20:28)
Re: Release schedule (was Re: Improvement in SET commandsyntax) Vince Vielhaber (20:21)
[TEST] Archives should now work again ... The Hermit Hacker (20:16)
RE: row level locking vs concurrency ? Vince Vielhaber (20:15)
Archivses ... The Hermit Hacker (20:06)
09 March 2000
something just isn't right ... The Hermit Hacker (06:21)
work ... The Hermit Hacker (06:17)
Ack ... The Hermit Hacker (06:11)
ignore The Hermit Hacker (06:03)
test ... The Hermit Hacker (05:50)
Unrecognised machine in 7.0beta1 Adriaan Joubert (05:32)
Re: [HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling Ed Loehr (04:21)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian (02:01)
Re: [HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling Tom Lane (01:05)
Re: [HACKERS] regex (from TODO) Tatsuo Ishii (01:02)
RE: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Hiroshi Inoue (00:37)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Ross J. Reedstrom (00:22)
Re: [HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling Ed Loehr (00:10)
08 March 2000
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian (23:26)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Ross J. Reedstrom (21:20)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Lamar Owen (21:16)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block The Hermit Hacker (20:14)
Re: [HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling Tom Lane (19:54)
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Tom Lane (19:50)
Re: [HACKERS] Regression test failure (runcheck) Bruce Momjian (19:37)
Re: [HACKERS] regex (from TODO) Bruce Momjian (19:36)
Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Tom Lane (19:30)
Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Patrick Welche (18:58)
[HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling Ed Loehr (17:37)
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Michael Meskes (17:00)
Regression test failure (runcheck) Keith Parks (16:53)
[HACKERS] SPI and qCache and bug? Karel Zak - Zakkr (16:33)
regex (from TODO) Karel Zak - Zakkr (16:26)
Re: Casts in 7.0 vs 6.5 (was Re: [SQL] 7.0beta bug (or feature)?) Kyle Bateman (16:19)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane (16:16)
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Michael Meskes (15:43)
Re: [HACKERS] pSQL auth Michael Meskes (15:43)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Michael Alan Dorman (14:04)
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Thomas Lockhart (13:58)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Mark Hollomon (13:04)
RE: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Hiroshi Inoue (10:08)
RE: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Hiroshi Inoue (09:36)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane (08:41)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Philip Warner (08:32)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane (08:32)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Mike Mascari (08:15)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian (07:34)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Philip Warner (07:23)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian (07:01)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane (06:55)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Chris Bitmead (06:28)
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Michael Meskes (06:25)
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. The Hermit Hacker (06:07)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Philip Warner (06:07)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian (05:56)
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. Bruce Momjian (05:51)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block The Hermit Hacker (05:50)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Thomas Lockhart (05:48)
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. The Hermit Hacker (05:43)
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Thomas Lockhart (05:39)
Re: [HACKERS] CREATE VIEW fix Thomas Lockhart (05:20)
Re: [HACKERS] 'LIKE' enhancement suggestion The Hermit Hacker (05:19)
Re: [HACKERS] 'LIKE' enhancement suggestion Tom Lane (05:07)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian (04:56)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Lamar Owen (03:18)
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. Tatsuo Ishii (03:03)
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. D. Jay Newman (02:48)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian (01:53)
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. Bruce Momjian (01:51)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian (01:49)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Bruce Momjian (01:45)
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Bruce Momjian (01:35)
Re: [HACKERS] CREATE VIEW fix Bruce Momjian (01:32)
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Bruce Momjian (01:31)
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Tom Lane (01:28)
Re: [HACKERS] 'LIKE' enhancement suggestion JB (01:25)
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. The Hermit Hacker (01:20)
pSQL auth Jacopo Silva (01:17)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane (01:14)
Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS The Hermit Hacker (01:09)
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. Tom Lane (01:04)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane (00:55)
Re: [HACKERS] 'LIKE' enhancement suggestion Tom Lane (00:32)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_pwd trigger to be removed Tom Lane (00:22)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian (00:18)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian (00:18)
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta Tom Lane (00:15)
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. Bruce Momjian (00:13)
Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS Bruce Momjian (00:10)
Casts in 7.0 vs 6.5 (was Re: [SQL] 7.0beta bug (or feature)?) Tom Lane (00:07)
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme Bruce Momjian (00:07)
'LIKE' enhancement suggestion JB (00:04)
07 March 2000
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. Bruce Momjian (23:49)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian (23:41)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_pwd trigger to be removed Bruce Momjian (23:39)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian (23:36)
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Bruce Momjian (23:26)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Tom Lane (23:22)
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question The Hermit Hacker (23:07)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Bruce Momjian (22:53)
Re: [HACKERS] CREATE VIEW fix Ross J. Reedstrom (19:42)
Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Tom Lane (19:29)
SCHEMA support (was Re: DROP TABLE inside a transaction block) Ross J. Reedstrom (19:25)
Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Patrick Welche (17:22)
Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Tom Lane (17:01)
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Lamar Owen (16:58)
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Thomas Lockhart (16:49)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane (16:47)
Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Patrick Welche (16:41)
Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Tom Lane (16:34)
Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Tom Lane (16:19)
How can I create trigger on system table, for on example pg_class ??? Andrzej Mazurkiewicz (16:15)
CREATE VIEW fix Thomas Lockhart (16:05)
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Thomas Lockhart (15:42)
ECPG restructuring Michael Meskes (15:09)
library policy question Michael Meskes (15:08)
alter_table.sql Patrick Welche (14:52)
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme Tom Lane (08:16)
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta Tom Lane (08:09)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tatsuo Ishii (08:06)
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane (07:54)
Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Tom Lane (06:58)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Version 7.0 beta problem Tom Lane (06:55)
Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. yutaka tanida (05:17)
Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS Thomas Lockhart (05:07)
Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS Ross J. Reedstrom (05:04)
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme Bruce Momjian (03:33)
Re: [HACKERS] TransactionStateData and AbsoluteTime Tatsuo Ishii (01:35)
Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS Tatsuo Ishii (01:07)
sqgfault on initdb with current CVS Ross J. Reedstrom (00:37)
06 March 2000
Re: [HACKERS] Re: ACL enhancements Ross J. Reedstrom (18:38)
Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme Peter Eisentraut (15:57)
Re: ACL enhancements Karel Zak - Zakkr (13:47)
Re: AW: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Mike Mascari (10:47)
AW: AW: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Zeugswetter Andreas SB (10:28)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
pgsql-hackers 2000-03 Chronological Index (1/2)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 03:36:47 2012284 messages
- Thread Index
- [Prev Page]
- [Next Page]
- 18 January 2012
- [no subject] Unknown (03:36)
- [6.5.3] further investigation ... The Hermit Hacker (01:47)
- Re: Docs refreshed Peter Eisentraut (22:20)
- Mailing list round trip time Thomas Lockhart (23:25)
- arg .. The Hermit Hacker (06:25)
- Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Tom Lane (23:52)
- 'LIKE' enhancement JB (23:53)
- Re: [HACKERS] TransactionStateData and AbsoluteTime Thomas Lockhart (23:04)
- Thread Index
- [Prev Page]
- [Next Page]