• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
  • Developer lists
    • pgsql-cluster-hackers
    • pgsql-committers
    • pgsql-hackers
    • pgsql-rrreviewers
    • pgsql-testers
    • pgsql-www
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-hackers 2000-01 Thread Index (1/10)

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• reduce pg_hba.conf restrictions ... The Hermit Hacker (Tue 01 03:10)
• RE: [HACKERS] reduce pg_hba.conf restrictions ... Vince Vielhaber (Tue 01 03:30)
• RE: [HACKERS] reduce pg_hba.conf restrictions ... The Hermit Hacker (Tue 01 03:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] reduce pg_hba.conf restrictions ... Tom Lane (Tue 01 03:43)
• The Apache Model (was Re: Copyright) Philip Warner (Tue 01 00:53)
• request for tuning suggestions from PC Week Labs Timothy Dyck (Mon 31 23:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] request for tuning suggestions from PC Week Labs Tom Lane (Tue 01 02:37)
• Recent RI changes have broken something Oliver Elphick (Mon 31 22:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Recent RI changes have broken something Tom Lane (Tue 01 02:07)
• PClabs Survey, Part I: Administration (resend) The Hermit Hacker (Mon 31 21:41)
• PCLabs Survey, Part VIII: Data Warehousing and Reporting The Hermit Hacker (Mon 31 21:40)
• PCLabs Survey, Part VII: Embedded Database / Branch Office Support The Hermit Hacker (Mon 31 21:39)
• PCLabs Survey, Part VI: Query Language and Database Design The Hermit Hacker (Mon 31 21:38)
• PCLabs Survey, Part V: Programmability The Hermit Hacker (Mon 31 21:37)
• PCLabs Survey, Part IV: Interoperability The Hermit Hacker (Mon 31 21:36)
• PCLabs Survey, Part III: Multimedia Data Types The Hermit Hacker (Mon 31 21:36)
• PCLabs Survey, Part II: Server Engine The Hermit Hacker (Mon 31 21:36)
• PClabs Survey, Part I: Administration The Hermit Hacker (Mon 31 21:34)
• Duplicate index check in btbuild Hiroshi Inoue (Mon 31 14:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Duplicate index check in btbuild Tom Lane (Mon 31 16:01)
• RE: [HACKERS] Duplicate index check in btbuild Hiroshi Inoue (Mon 31 23:49)
• Re: [ADMIN] Attribute 'aggtransfn1' is repeated Peter Vazsonyi (Mon 31 14:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] Attribute 'aggtransfn1' is repeated Bruce Momjian (Tue 01 02:02)
• [HACKERS] float4 confused as int?? Ed Loehr (Mon 31 04:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] float4 confused as int?? Tom Lane (Mon 31 15:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] float4 confused as int?? Ed Loehr (Mon 31 16:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] float4 confused as int?? Ed Loehr (Mon 31 16:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] float4 confused as int?? Ed Loehr (Mon 31 18:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] float4 confused as int?? Ed Loehr (Mon 31 20:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] float4 confused as int?? Tom Lane (Tue 01 02:04)
• RE: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS Ansley, Michael (Sun 30 22:24)
• Case-folding bogosity in new psql Tom Lane (Sun 30 22:20)
• Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Peter Eisentraut (Mon 31 13:14)
• Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Tom Lane (Mon 31 15:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql The Hermit Hacker (Mon 31 15:26)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Peter Eisentraut (Mon 31 15:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Bruce Momjian (Tue 01 02:03)
• Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Peter Eisentraut (Mon 31 15:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Bruce Momjian (Tue 01 02:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Thomas Lockhart (Tue 01 02:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql The Hermit Hacker (Tue 01 02:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Lamar Owen (Tue 01 03:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql The Hermit Hacker (Tue 01 03:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Bruce Momjian (Tue 01 03:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Don Baccus (Tue 01 02:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Bruce Momjian (Tue 01 03:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Tom Lane (Tue 01 03:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Bruce Momjian (Tue 01 03:38)
• corel9 jo (Sun 30 20:59)
• Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane (Sun 30 15:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Bruce Momjian (Sun 30 17:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane (Sun 30 18:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Bruce Momjian (Sun 30 19:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane (Sun 30 21:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Bruce Momjian (Sun 30 21:57)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane (Mon 31 01:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Bruce Momjian (Mon 31 02:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Peter Eisentraut (Mon 31 12:57)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Peter Eisentraut (Mon 31 12:55)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane (Mon 31 15:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Bruce Momjian (Tue 01 02:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Patrick Welche (Mon 31 19:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane (Tue 01 02:02)
• freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Tom Lane (Sat 29 22:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Bruce Momjian (Sun 30 03:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Tom Lane (Sun 30 03:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Peter Eisentraut (Mon 31 12:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? The Hermit Hacker (Mon 31 13:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Peter Eisentraut (Mon 31 13:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? The Hermit Hacker (Mon 31 14:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Tom Lane (Mon 31 15:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Bruce Momjian (Tue 01 02:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? The Hermit Hacker (Tue 01 02:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Tom Lane (Tue 01 03:09)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? The Hermit Hacker (Tue 01 03:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Bruce Momjian (Tue 01 03:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Tom Lane (Tue 01 03:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Bruce Momjian (Tue 01 02:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Bruce Momjian (Tue 01 02:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? The Hermit Hacker (Tue 01 02:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Bruce Momjian (Tue 01 02:36)
• RE: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Hiroshi Inoue (Sun 30 06:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Tom Lane (Sun 30 06:33)
• RE: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Hiroshi Inoue (Mon 31 00:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Tom Lane (Mon 31 01:55)
• ImmediateSharedRelationCacheInvalidate considered harmful Tom Lane (Sat 29 20:40)
• RE: ImmediateSharedRelationCacheInvalidate considered harmful Hiroshi Inoue (Sun 30 03:15)
• Re: ImmediateSharedRelationCacheInvalidate considered harmful Tom Lane (Sun 30 04:18)
• RE: ImmediateSharedRelationCacheInvalidate considered harmful Hiroshi Inoue (Sun 30 23:36)
• Locale patch Oleg Broytmann (Sat 29 14:38)
• Does initdb -e is working ? (Latest dev. snapshot) Oleg Bartunov (Sat 29 10:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] Does initdb -e is working ? (Latest dev. snapshot) Tatsuo Ishii (Sat 29 11:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] Does initdb -e is working ? (Latest dev. snapshot) Oleg Bartunov (Sat 29 12:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Does initdb -e is working ? (Latest dev. snapshot) Peter Eisentraut (Sat 29 16:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] Does initdb -e is working ? (Latest dev. snapshot) Peter Eisentraut (Sat 29 16:53)
• select count(*) from hits group by count; Oleg Bartunov (Sat 29 09:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] select count(*) from hits group by count; Tom Lane (Sat 29 16:25)
• RE: [HACKERS] select count(*) from hits group by count; Dmitry Samersoff (Sat 29 16:40)
• Help with pl/pgsql, triggers, and foreign keys Roland Roberts (Sat 29 04:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] Help with pl/pgsql, triggers, and foreign keys Don Baccus (Sat 29 06:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] Help with pl/pgsql, triggers, and foreign keys Ed Loehr (Sat 29 08:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Help with pl/pgsql, triggers, and foreign keys Jan Wieck (Mon 31 10:00)
• Beta is February 15th Bruce Momjian (Sat 29 01:57)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) Oleg Broytmann (Sat 29 13:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) Bruce Momjian (Sat 29 17:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) Oleg Broytmann (Sat 29 17:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) Dmitry Samersoff (Sat 29 18:37)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) Vince Vielhaber (Mon 31 01:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) The Hermit Hacker (Sat 29 17:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) Oleg Broytmann (Sat 29 17:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) The Hermit Hacker (Sat 29 17:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) Jeff MacDonald <jeff(at)pgsql(dot)com> (Sat 29 19:18)
• elog ability for plperl Mark Hollomon (Sat 29 01:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] elog ability for plperl Bruce Momjian (Sat 29 01:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Don Baccus (Fri 28 20:26)
• Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Don Baccus (Fri 28 21:13)
• [HACKERS] Trigger drop/create bug? Ed Loehr (Fri 28 19:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] Trigger drop/create bug? Ed Loehr (Fri 28 19:32)
• END/ABORT Peter Eisentraut (Fri 28 17:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Bruce Momjian (Fri 28 19:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Brook Milligan (Fri 28 21:09)
• Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Bruce Momjian (Fri 28 22:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Peter Eisentraut (Sat 29 16:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Jan Wieck (Mon 31 08:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Don Baccus (Mon 31 18:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Tom Lane (Fri 28 22:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Peter Eisentraut (Sat 29 11:09)
• Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Tom Lane (Sat 29 15:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Bruce Momjian (Sat 29 17:25)
• Copyright Peter Eisentraut (Fri 28 17:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Bruce Momjian (Fri 28 19:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Tom Lane (Fri 28 22:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Ross J. Reedstrom (Fri 28 23:07)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Tatsuo Ishii (Sat 29 03:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Philip Warner (Sat 29 05:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Don Baccus (Sat 29 06:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright The Hermit Hacker (Sat 29 05:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Philip Warner (Sat 29 05:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Bruce Momjian (Sat 29 05:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Philip Warner (Sat 29 06:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Don Baccus (Sat 29 06:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Philip Warner (Sat 29 06:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Don Baccus (Sat 29 15:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright The Hermit Hacker (Sat 29 16:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Don Baccus (Sat 29 06:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Thomas Lockhart (Sat 29 07:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Thomas Lockhart (Sat 29 06:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Tom Lane (Sat 29 07:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Hannu Krosing (Sat 29 20:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Bruce Momjian (Sat 29 20:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Michael Meskes (Sat 29 09:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Mike Mascari (Sat 29 10:10)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Michael Meskes (Sat 29 19:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Chris Bitmead (Sun 30 23:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Michael Meskes (Sat 29 09:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Philip Warner (Fri 28 23:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Ed Loehr (Sat 29 00:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Peter Eisentraut (Sat 29 16:52)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: Copyright Robert E. Bruccoleri (Sat 29 02:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright Tom Lane (Sat 29 05:55)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright Philip Warner (Sat 29 06:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright Tom Lane (Sat 29 07:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright Don Baccus (Sat 29 06:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright Tom Lane (Sat 29 07:10)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright Don Baccus (Sat 29 15:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright Ross J. Reedstrom (Sun 30 00:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright The Hermit Hacker (Sat 29 17:10)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright The Hermit Hacker (Sat 29 16:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright Don Baccus (Sat 29 18:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright The Hermit Hacker (Sat 29 20:41)
• Bit strings Adriaan Joubert (Fri 28 17:31)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Bit strings Adriaan Joubert (Fri 28 17:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bit strings Thomas Lockhart (Sat 29 06:57)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bit strings Adriaan Joubert (Sun 30 14:44)
• postgres under gdb Chris (Fri 28 13:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] postgres under gdb Tom Lane (Fri 28 14:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] postgres under gdb Bruce Momjian (Fri 28 17:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] postgres under gdb Thomas Lockhart (Fri 28 15:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] postgres under gdb Bruce Momjian (Fri 28 17:32)
• OO and tuples of different types Chris (Fri 28 11:13)

---

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc