• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
  • Developer lists
    • pgsql-cluster-hackers
    • pgsql-committers
    • pgsql-hackers
    • pgsql-rrreviewers
    • pgsql-testers
    • pgsql-www
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-hackers 1999-12 Thread Index (1/6)

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• How you can put over 20 GB on a single CD! Sören Kreimeier (Fri 31 15:15)
• Happy New Year! Vadim Mikheev (Fri 31 12:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] Happy New Year! The Hermit Hacker (Fri 31 13:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] Happy New Year! Vince Vielhaber (Fri 31 14:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] Happy New Year! The Hermit Hacker (Fri 31 15:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] Happy New Year! Jan Wieck (Sat 01 03:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] Happy New Year! Peter Mount (Fri 31 16:49)
• AW: AW: [HACKERS] correlated subquery Zeugswetter Andreas SB (Fri 31 08:39)
• When are subqueries needed Bruce Momjian (Fri 31 07:00)
• LIKE fixed(?) for non-ASCII collation orders Tom Lane (Fri 31 05:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] LIKE fixed(?) for non-ASCII collation orders Andreas Degert (Fri 31 14:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] LIKE fixed(?) for non-ASCII collation orders Tom Lane (Fri 31 15:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] LIKE fixed(?) for non-ASCII collation orders Bruce Momjian (Fri 31 18:51)
• Is backend-libpq's "PQexec/PQfn/portal" code dead? Tom Lane (Fri 31 01:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] Is backend-libpq's "PQexec/PQfn/portal" code dead? Bruce Momjian (Fri 31 03:36)
• RPMS on PostgreSQL.org updated. Lamar Owen (Thu 30 21:08)
• HEAP_MOVED_IN error during vacuum? Stephen Birch (Thu 30 16:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] HEAP_MOVED_IN error during vacuum? Tom Lane (Fri 31 02:05)
• AW: [HACKERS] correlated subquery Zeugswetter Andreas SB (Thu 30 13:43)
• Re: AW: [HACKERS] correlated subquery Tom Lane (Thu 30 15:06)
• Re: AW: [HACKERS] correlated subquery Bruce Momjian (Thu 30 17:31)
• RE: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Ansley, Michael (Thu 30 09:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Adriaan Joubert (Thu 30 10:10)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Theo Kramer (Thu 30 11:19)
• Source code format vote Bruce Momjian (Thu 30 06:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Theo Kramer (Thu 30 07:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote J. Roeleveld (Thu 30 08:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Bruce Momjian (Thu 30 17:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Stephen Birch (Thu 30 13:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Bruce Momjian (Thu 30 17:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Tom Lane (Thu 30 15:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Bruce Momjian (Thu 30 17:31)
• correlated subquery Bruce Momjian (Wed 29 22:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] correlated subquery Tom Lane (Wed 29 23:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] correlated subquery sszabo (Thu 30 00:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] correlated subquery Bruce Momjian (Thu 30 00:52)
• Using aggregate in HAVING Bruce Momjian (Wed 29 19:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] Using aggregate in HAVING Mike Mascari (Wed 29 20:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] Using aggregate in HAVING Bruce Momjian (Wed 29 20:26)
• Re: [HACKERS] Using aggregate in HAVING Mike Mascari (Wed 29 20:59)
• revoke/grant rights issue svn (Wed 29 19:21)
• Re: [SQL] Index scan on CIDR field ? Tom Lane (Wed 29 15:48)
• subquery performance and EXISTS Bruce Momjian (Wed 29 14:33)
• Re: subquery performance and EXISTS Tom Lane (Wed 29 16:09)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: subquery performance and EXISTS Bruce Momjian (Wed 29 21:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: subquery performance and EXISTS Tom Lane (Wed 29 22:26)
• PL/pgSQL install procedure Tatsuo Ishii (Wed 29 13:32)
• Index Puzzle for you Kristofer Munn (Wed 29 02:55)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index Puzzle for you Tom Lane (Wed 29 05:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index Puzzle for you Kristofer Munn (Wed 29 07:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index Puzzle for you Bruce Momjian (Wed 29 10:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index Puzzle for you Tom Lane (Wed 29 15:21)
• Re: [BUGS] INET operators and NOT Tom Lane (Tue 28 23:37)
• LZTEXT is removed Jan Wieck (Tue 28 13:45)
• can't link libpq.so(inet_aton() not found) Hiroshi Inoue (Tue 28 07:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] can't link libpq.so(inet_aton() not found) Tom Lane (Tue 28 15:19)
• RE: [HACKERS] can't link libpq.so(inet_aton() not found) Hiroshi Inoue (Wed 29 01:54)
• RE: What database i can use? (fwd) Marc G. Fournier (Tue 28 02:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] RE: What database i can use? (fwd) Thomas Lockhart (Tue 28 06:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] RE: What database i can use? (fwd) Don Baccus (Tue 28 13:11)
• RE: [HACKERS] Explain plan output Ansley, Michael (Mon 27 17:36)
• RE: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Ansley, Michael (Mon 27 14:36)
• Logfile rotation Matthew Hagerty (Mon 27 13:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] Logfile rotation Tom Lane (Mon 27 16:14)
• pg_dump update Ansley, Michael (Mon 27 13:21)
• memory dilemma Karel Zak - Zakkr (Mon 27 12:55)
• Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Don Baccus (Mon 27 13:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Karel Zak - Zakkr (Mon 27 13:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Tom Lane (Mon 27 16:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Karel Zak - Zakkr (Tue 28 10:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Don Baccus (Tue 28 13:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Don Baccus (Mon 27 17:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Tom Lane (Mon 27 15:36)
• AW: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Zeugswetter Andreas SB (Mon 27 09:42)
• Unlimited query length - The final chapter (part II) Ansley, Michael (Mon 27 09:24)
• Re: [PATCHES] Unlimited query length - The final chapter (part II) Bruce Momjian (Mon 27 15:45)
• Explain plan output Ansley, Michael (Mon 27 09:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Explain plan output Tom Lane (Mon 27 15:51)
• Unlimited query length - the final chapter (aka pg_dump) Ansley, Michael (Mon 27 09:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Unlimited query length - the final chapter (aka pg_dump) Bruce Momjian (Mon 27 15:42)
• ecpg enhance patch Tatsuo Ishii (Mon 27 07:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] ecpg enhance patch Michael Meskes (Mon 27 15:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] ecpg enhance patch Tatsuo Ishii (Tue 28 02:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] database replication Damond Walker (Sun 26 14:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] database replication Ryan Kirkpatrick (Mon 27 01:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] database replication Hannu Krosing (Mon 27 09:06)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] database replication Michael Robinson (Mon 27 11:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] database replication Aaron J. Seigo (Mon 27 18:26)
• question about MS Access connect to Postgresql 6.5.2-1 Kevin Lam (Sun 26 01:51)
• Re: question about MS Access connect to Postgresql 6.5.2-1 Dmitry (Mon 27 06:51)
• dubious improvement in new psql Tom Lane (Sun 26 01:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] dubious improvement in new psql Peter Eisentraut (Tue 28 22:13)
• ǧìûÖ®Äê´ó·îËÍ Ë«Ï²ÁÙÃŵ½Íõ³¯ aa (Sat 25 03:29)
• database replication DWalker (Fri 24 15:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] database replication Ed Loehr (Sat 25 00:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] database replication Damond Walker (Sat 25 03:09)
• Re: [HACKERS] database replication Ryan Kirkpatrick (Sat 25 22:26)
• Re: [HACKERS] database replication Duane Currie (Thu 30 13:31)
• Error "vacuum pg_proc" Mateus Cordeiro Inssa (Fri 24 11:55)
• Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Tom Lane (Fri 24 15:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Tom Lane (Sun 26 21:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Bruce Momjian (Mon 27 02:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Tom Lane (Mon 27 03:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Bruce Momjian (Mon 27 03:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Tom Lane (Mon 27 04:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Tom Lane (Mon 27 04:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Bruce Momjian (Mon 27 05:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Mateus Cordeiro Inssa (Mon 27 13:09)
• Is there a tool to get at old/deleted tuples ? Hannu Krosing (Fri 24 09:53)
• RE: [HACKERS] Source code format votest Peter Mount (Fri 24 09:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votest Bruce Momjian (Fri 24 16:41)
• Replication Damond Walker (Fri 24 05:26)
• Announcing PostgreSQL 6.5.3-3 and 6.5.3-3nl RPMs. Lamar Owen (Fri 24 04:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 21:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes D'Arcy (Thu 23 23:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votest Bruce Momjian (Fri 24 04:02)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• RE: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Peter Mount (Fri 24 08:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Tom Lane (Fri 24 15:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (Fri 24 16:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Oleg Broytmann (Fri 24 16:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Marc G. Fournier (Sat 25 02:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (Fri 24 16:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Tom Lane (Fri 24 17:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Vince Vielhaber (Fri 24 17:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Thomas Lockhart (Sun 26 16:41)
• RE: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Peter Mount (Fri 24 09:31)
• Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 21:44)
• RE: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Vince Vielhaber (Thu 23 21:57)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 22:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Vince Vielhaber (Thu 23 22:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Jan Wieck (Thu 23 23:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (Fri 24 04:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Tom Lane (Fri 24 00:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (Fri 24 02:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Peter Eisentraut (Fri 24 21:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (Fri 24 22:05)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (Fri 24 04:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Tom Lane (Fri 24 05:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (Fri 24 16:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Hiroshi Inoue (Fri 24 05:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Michael Meskes (Fri 24 10:03)
• Index corruption Adriaan Joubert (Thu 23 17:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Ed Loehr (Thu 23 18:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Tom Lane (Fri 24 00:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert (Sat 25 12:55)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Bruce Momjian (Sat 25 15:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert (Wed 29 13:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert (Wed 29 13:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Bruce Momjian (Wed 29 14:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert (Wed 29 15:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Bruce Momjian (Wed 29 19:07)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert (Wed 29 14:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Tom Lane (Wed 29 16:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Bruce Momjian (Wed 29 19:09)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert (Wed 29 20:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Tom Lane (Wed 29 22:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Jan Wieck (Thu 30 00:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Jan Wieck (Wed 29 23:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Jan Wieck (Wed 29 22:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert (Wed 29 23:03)
• Cascade on delete Robert Badaracco (Thu 23 16:20)
• libpg and remote access Robert Badaracco (Thu 23 16:20)
• Foreign Key support Robert Badaracco (Thu 23 16:20)
• --with-mb=SQL_ASCII for 6.5.3 RPMs. Lamar Owen (Thu 23 15:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] --with-mb=SQL_ASCII for 6.5.3 RPMs. Tom Lane (Thu 23 17:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] --with-mb=SQL_ASCII for 6.5.3 RPMs. Lamar Owen (Thu 23 18:38)
• empty concatenate Karel Zak - Zakkr (Thu 23 15:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 15:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate Karel Zak - Zakkr (Thu 23 16:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate sszabo (Thu 23 16:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate Karel Zak - Zakkr (Thu 23 17:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate D'Arcy (Thu 23 17:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate Tom Lane (Fri 24 00:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate D'Arcy (Fri 24 02:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate Tom Lane (Thu 23 17:37)
• Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate Jose Soares (Thu 23 16:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Non-group columns with aggregate functions Keith Parks (Wed 22 21:26)
• Non-group columns with aggregate functions Ricardo Coelho (Wed 22 19:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Non-group columns with aggregate functions Ed Loehr (Wed 22 20:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] Non-group columns with aggregate functions Ricardo Coelho (Wed 22 21:46)

---

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc