• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
  • Developer lists
    • pgsql-cluster-hackers
    • pgsql-committers
    • pgsql-hackers
    • pgsql-rrreviewers
    • pgsql-testers
    • pgsql-www
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-hackers 1999-12 Chronological Index (1/6)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• 01 January 2000
  • Re: [HACKERS] Happy New Year! Jan Wieck (03:21)
• 31 December 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] LIKE fixed(?) for non-ASCII collation orders Bruce Momjian (18:51)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Happy New Year! Peter Mount (16:49)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Happy New Year! The Hermit Hacker (15:52)
  • Re: [HACKERS] LIKE fixed(?) for non-ASCII collation orders Tom Lane (15:42)
  • How you can put over 20 GB on a single CD! Sören Kreimeier (15:15)
  • Re: [HACKERS] LIKE fixed(?) for non-ASCII collation orders Andreas Degert (14:58)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Happy New Year! Vince Vielhaber (14:50)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Happy New Year! The Hermit Hacker (13:31)
  • Happy New Year! Vadim Mikheev (12:50)
  • AW: AW: [HACKERS] correlated subquery Zeugswetter Andreas SB (08:39)
  • When are subqueries needed Bruce Momjian (07:00)
  • LIKE fixed(?) for non-ASCII collation orders Tom Lane (05:54)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Is backend-libpq's "PQexec/PQfn/portal" code dead? Bruce Momjian (03:36)
  • Re: [HACKERS] HEAP_MOVED_IN error during vacuum? Tom Lane (02:05)
  • Is backend-libpq's "PQexec/PQfn/portal" code dead? Tom Lane (01:50)
• 30 December 1999
  • RPMS on PostgreSQL.org updated. Lamar Owen (21:08)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Bruce Momjian (17:31)
  • Re: AW: [HACKERS] correlated subquery Bruce Momjian (17:31)
  • Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Bruce Momjian (17:04)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Bruce Momjian (17:02)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Bruce Momjian (17:02)
  • HEAP_MOVED_IN error during vacuum? Stephen Birch (16:44)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Tom Lane (15:11)
  • Re: AW: [HACKERS] correlated subquery Tom Lane (15:06)
  • AW: [HACKERS] correlated subquery Zeugswetter Andreas SB (13:43)
  • Re: [HACKERS] database replication Duane Currie (13:31)
  • Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Stephen Birch (13:17)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Stephen Birch (13:02)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Theo Kramer (11:19)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Adriaan Joubert (10:10)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Ansley, Michael (09:21)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote J. Roeleveld (08:14)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Theo Kramer (07:50)
  • Source code format vote Bruce Momjian (06:30)
  • Re: [HACKERS] correlated subquery Bruce Momjian (00:52)
  • Re: [HACKERS] correlated subquery sszabo (00:02)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Jan Wieck (00:01)
• 29 December 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Jan Wieck (23:36)
  • Re: [HACKERS] correlated subquery Tom Lane (23:24)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert (23:03)
  • correlated subquery Bruce Momjian (22:56)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Jan Wieck (22:35)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: subquery performance and EXISTS Tom Lane (22:26)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Tom Lane (22:00)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: subquery performance and EXISTS Bruce Momjian (21:20)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Using aggregate in HAVING Mike Mascari (20:59)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert (20:52)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Using aggregate in HAVING Bruce Momjian (20:26)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Using aggregate in HAVING Mike Mascari (20:19)
  • Using aggregate in HAVING Bruce Momjian (19:51)
  • revoke/grant rights issue svn (19:21)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Bruce Momjian (19:09)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Bruce Momjian (19:07)
  • Re: subquery performance and EXISTS Tom Lane (16:09)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Tom Lane (16:02)
  • Re: [SQL] Index scan on CIDR field ? Tom Lane (15:48)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert (15:41)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index Puzzle for you Tom Lane (15:21)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert (14:35)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Bruce Momjian (14:34)
  • subquery performance and EXISTS Bruce Momjian (14:33)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert (13:54)
  • PL/pgSQL install procedure Tatsuo Ishii (13:32)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert (13:02)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index Puzzle for you Bruce Momjian (10:16)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index Puzzle for you Kristofer Munn (07:13)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index Puzzle for you Tom Lane (05:50)
  • Index Puzzle for you Kristofer Munn (02:55)
  • RE: [HACKERS] can't link libpq.so(inet_aton() not found) Hiroshi Inoue (01:54)
• 28 December 1999
  • Re: [BUGS] INET operators and NOT Tom Lane (23:37)
  • Re: [HACKERS] dubious improvement in new psql Peter Eisentraut (22:13)
  • Re: [HACKERS] can't link libpq.so(inet_aton() not found) Tom Lane (15:19)
  • LZTEXT is removed Jan Wieck (13:45)
  • Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Don Baccus (13:19)
  • Re: [HACKERS] RE: What database i can use? (fwd) Don Baccus (13:11)
  • Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Karel Zak - Zakkr (10:46)
  • can't link libpq.so(inet_aton() not found) Hiroshi Inoue (07:24)
  • Re: [HACKERS] RE: What database i can use? (fwd) Thomas Lockhart (06:28)
  • Re: [HACKERS] ecpg enhance patch Tatsuo Ishii (02:35)
  • RE: What database i can use? (fwd) Marc G. Fournier (02:14)
• 27 December 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] database replication Aaron J. Seigo (18:26)
  • Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Don Baccus (17:54)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Explain plan output Ansley, Michael (17:36)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Logfile rotation Tom Lane (16:14)
  • Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Tom Lane (16:11)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Explain plan output Tom Lane (15:51)
  • Re: [PATCHES] Unlimited query length - The final chapter (part II) Bruce Momjian (15:45)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Unlimited query length - the final chapter (aka pg_dump) Bruce Momjian (15:42)
  • Re: [HACKERS] ecpg enhance patch Michael Meskes (15:36)
  • Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Tom Lane (15:36)
  • RE: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Ansley, Michael (14:36)
  • Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Karel Zak - Zakkr (13:40)
  • Logfile rotation Matthew Hagerty (13:29)
  • pg_dump update Ansley, Michael (13:21)
  • Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Don Baccus (13:12)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Mateus Cordeiro Inssa (13:09)
  • memory dilemma Karel Zak - Zakkr (12:55)
  • Re: [HACKERS] database replication Michael Robinson (11:35)
  • AW: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Zeugswetter Andreas SB (09:42)
  • Unlimited query length - The final chapter (part II) Ansley, Michael (09:24)
  • Explain plan output Ansley, Michael (09:24)
  • Unlimited query length - the final chapter (aka pg_dump) Ansley, Michael (09:24)
  • Re: [HACKERS] database replication Hannu Krosing (09:06)
  • ecpg enhance patch Tatsuo Ishii (07:49)
  • Re: question about MS Access connect to Postgresql 6.5.2-1 Dmitry (06:51)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Bruce Momjian (05:30)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Tom Lane (04:21)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Tom Lane (04:16)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Bruce Momjian (03:38)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Tom Lane (03:24)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Bruce Momjian (02:32)
  • Re: [HACKERS] database replication Ryan Kirkpatrick (01:05)
• 26 December 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Tom Lane (21:21)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Thomas Lockhart (16:41)
  • Re: [HACKERS] database replication Damond Walker (14:17)
  • question about MS Access connect to Postgresql 6.5.2-1 Kevin Lam (01:51)
  • dubious improvement in new psql Tom Lane (01:36)
• 25 December 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] database replication Ryan Kirkpatrick (22:26)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Bruce Momjian (15:33)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert (12:55)
  • ǧìûÖ®Äê´ó·îËÍ Ë«Ï²ÁÙÃŵ½Íõ³¯ aa (03:29)
  • Re: [HACKERS] database replication Damond Walker (03:09)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Marc G. Fournier (02:15)
  • Re: [HACKERS] database replication Ed Loehr (00:21)
• 24 December 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (22:05)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Peter Eisentraut (21:40)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed7 Peter Eisentraut (21:35)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed Peter Eisentraut (21:29)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Vince Vielhaber (17:52)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Tom Lane (17:24)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Oleg Broytmann (16:56)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (16:46)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (16:41)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votest Bruce Momjian (16:41)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (16:32)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Tom Lane (15:53)
  • Re: [HACKERS] T-O-A-S-T meaning Thomas Lockhart (15:40)
  • database replication DWalker (15:29)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Tom Lane (15:08)
  • Error "vacuum pg_proc" Mateus Cordeiro Inssa (11:55)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Michael Meskes (10:03)
  • Is there a tool to get at old/deleted tuples ? Hannu Krosing (09:53)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Source code format votest Peter Mount (09:32)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Peter Mount (09:31)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Peter Mount (08:56)
  • Replication Damond Walker (05:26)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Hiroshi Inoue (05:16)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Tom Lane (05:11)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votest Bruce Momjian (04:02)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (04:02)
  • Announcing PostgreSQL 6.5.3-3 and 6.5.3-3nl RPMs. Lamar Owen (04:01)
  • Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (04:00)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (02:33)
  • Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate D'Arcy (02:29)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Tom Lane (00:53)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Tom Lane (00:50)
  • Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate Tom Lane (00:44)
• 23 December 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Jan Wieck (23:23)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes D'Arcy (23:00)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Vince Vielhaber (22:53)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (22:11)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Vince Vielhaber (21:57)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (21:56)
  • Source code format votes Bruce Momjian (21:44)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Ed Loehr (18:45)
  • Re: [HACKERS] --with-mb=SQL_ASCII for 6.5.3 RPMs. Lamar Owen (18:38)
  • Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate D'Arcy (17:47)
  • Re: [HACKERS] --with-mb=SQL_ASCII for 6.5.3 RPMs. Tom Lane (17:47)
  • Index corruption Adriaan Joubert (17:46)
  • Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate Tom Lane (17:37)
  • Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate Karel Zak - Zakkr (17:16)
  • Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate sszabo (16:58)
  • Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate Jose Soares (16:36)
  • Cascade on delete Robert Badaracco (16:20)
  • libpg and remote access Robert Badaracco (16:20)
  • Foreign Key support Robert Badaracco (16:20)
  • Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate Karel Zak - Zakkr (16:11)
  • --with-mb=SQL_ASCII for 6.5.3 RPMs. Lamar Owen (15:59)
  • Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate Bruce Momjian (15:58)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]