• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
  • Developer lists
    • pgsql-cluster-hackers
    • pgsql-committers
    • pgsql-hackers
    • pgsql-rrreviewers
    • pgsql-testers
    • pgsql-www
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-hackers 1999-11 Chronological Index (1/6)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• 01 December 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] perl-DBD-Pg (was Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org: Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner <doom(at)kzsu(dot)stanford(dot)edu>] (fwd)) Lamar Owen (02:30)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response Peter Eisentraut (00:23)
  • Re: [HACKERS] perl-DBD-Pg (was Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org: Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner <doom(at)kzsu(dot)stanford(dot)edu>] (fwd)) Ian Macdonald (00:04)
• 30 November 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Peter Eisentraut (20:19)
  • Re: Ownership/protection (was Re: [HACKERS] Portability) Peter Eisentraut (19:36)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: tab completion in psql Brian E Gallew (18:49)
  • Re: tab completion in psql Bruce Momjian (17:55)
  • Re: Ownership/protection (was Re: [HACKERS] Portability) Vince Vielhaber (17:55)
  • Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? Bruce Momjian (17:53)
  • Re: tab completion in psql Peter Eisentraut (17:41)
  • Ownership/protection (was Re: [HACKERS] Portability) Tom Lane (17:33)
  • tab completion in psql Bruce Momjian (17:31)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? Don Baccus (17:27)
  • Re: Portability (was Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails) Vince Vielhaber (16:49)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? Lamar Owen (16:48)
  • Re: Portability (was Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails) Peter Eisentraut (16:44)
  • Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane (16:33)
  • Re: Portability (was Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails) Tom Lane (16:19)
  • Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? Oleg Bartunov (16:03)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Insert into view Theo Kramer (15:33)
  • Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? sk . list (15:12)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Insert into view Tom Lane (15:09)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Insert into view Ansley, Michael (12:56)
  • Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Peter Eisentraut (11:29)
  • Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem Oleg Bartunov (10:32)
  • Insert into view Theo Kramer (10:25)
  • Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Hannu Krosing (08:41)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Hiroshi Inoue (08:14)
  • Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Christof Petig (07:34)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type Bruce Momjian (07:05)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type Tom Lane (06:41)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type Adriaan Joubert (06:23)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Problems in 6.5.3 with Multi-Byte encoding Tatsuo Ishii (04:45)
  • Re: [HACKERS] IN clause and INTERSECT not behaving as expected Tom Lane (04:18)
  • Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane (04:13)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_ctl Tom Lane (04:04)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Bruce Momjian (04:03)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Tom Lane (04:00)
  • Re: [HACKERS] UNION not allowed in sub-selects? Bruce Momjian (03:54)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Michael Robinson (03:44)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A bag of psql goodies Bruce Momjian (03:28)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Problems in 6.5.3 with Multi-Byte encoding Bruce Momjian (03:19)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Status of sql_help.h Bruce Momjian (03:11)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables Bruce Momjian (03:00)
  • Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem Bruce Momjian (02:48)
  • Re: [HACKERS] IN clause and INTERSECT not behaving as expected Bruce Momjian (02:43)
  • Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem Tom Lane (02:37)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Bug Tom Lane (02:32)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response Tom Lane (02:32)
  • Re: A bug in NOT IN (SELECT ... Bruce Momjian (02:31)
  • Re: [PORTS] Re: [HACKERS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha Tom Lane (02:21)
  • Re: [HACKERS] having bug report Tom Lane (02:17)
  • Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] new patches Tom Lane (02:14)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre coding in _bt_binsrch Bruce Momjian (02:13)
  • Re: [HACKERS] destroydb doesn't close connection with client (httpd <-> pg) Tom Lane (02:11)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre coding in _bt_binsrch Tom Lane (02:09)
  • Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Bruce Momjian (02:02)
  • Re: [HACKERS] indexable and locale Bruce Momjian (01:53)
  • Re: indexable and locale Bruce Momjian (01:52)
  • Re: indexable and locale Bruce Momjian (01:52)
  • Re: [HACKERS] indexable and locale Bruce Momjian (01:52)
  • Re: [HACKERS] How to get info about deadlocks? Tim Holloway (01:47)
  • Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian (01:35)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_ctl Tatsuo Ishii (01:21)
  • Re: [PORTS] Re: [HACKERS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha Uncle George (00:57)
  • Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem Bruce Momjian (00:34)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Hiroshi Inoue (00:34)
  • Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Bruce Momjian (00:31)
  • Portability (was Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails) Peter Eisentraut (00:00)
• 29 November 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] How to get OID from INSERT in PL/PGSQL? Peter Eisentraut (23:59)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response Bruce Momjian (23:27)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Bug Bruce Momjian (23:15)
  • Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Bruce Momjian (23:01)
  • Re: [PORTS] Re: [HACKERS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha Bruce Momjian (22:49)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type Bruce Momjian (22:40)
  • Re: [HACKERS] having bug report Bruce Momjian (22:30)
  • Re: [HACKERS] destroydb doesn't close connection with client (httpd <-> pg) Bruce Momjian (22:29)
  • Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] new patches Bruce Momjian (22:29)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre coding in _bt_binsrch Bruce Momjian (22:24)
  • Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM as a denial-of-service attack The Hermit Hacker (20:55)
  • Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM as a denial-of-service attack Keith Parks (19:30)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Bruce Momjian (19:17)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Bruce Momjian (19:17)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Bruce Momjian (19:16)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Bruce Momjian (19:14)
  • Re: [HACKERS] How to get info about deadlocks? Massimo Dal Zotto (18:26)
  • Re: [HACKERS] perl-DBD-Pg (was Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org: Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner <doom(at)kzsu(dot)stanford(dot)edu>] (fwd)) Lamar Owen (17:00)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org: Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner <doom(at)kzsu(dot)stanford(dot)edu>] (fwd) Thomas Lockhart (16:20)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? Oleg Broytmann (16:01)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails Tom Lane (15:45)
  • Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? Oleg Bartunov (15:38)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails Peter Eisentraut (15:01)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Referential Integrety Jan Wieck (13:22)
  • Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Peter Eisentraut (12:05)
  • Pro*C conversion S S Mani (09:40)
  • Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Thomas Lockhart (08:19)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Tom Lane (08:12)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Vadim Mikheev (08:02)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Vadim Mikheev (07:58)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Tom Lane (07:37)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Bruce Momjian (07:34)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Vadim Mikheev (06:56)
  • Re: [HACKERS] How to get OID from INSERT in PL/PGSQL? Ed Loehr (06:43)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Bruce Momjian (06:34)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Vadim Mikheev (06:32)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Mike Mascari (06:18)
  • Re: [HACKERS] How to get info about deadlocks? Bruce Momjian (06:05)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Vadim Mikheev (06:04)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tatsuo Ishii (05:45)
  • Re: [HACKERS] How to get OID from INSERT in PL/PGSQL? Tom Lane (05:43)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bruce Momjian (05:28)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Bruce Momjian (05:27)
  • Re: [HACKERS] How to get OID from INSERT in PL/PGSQL? Ed Loehr (05:20)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Concurrent VACUUM: first results Tom Lane (05:14)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org: Non-member submission from [Joe Brenner <doom(at)kzsu(dot)stanford(dot)edu>] (fwd) Tom Lane (05:04)
  • Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM as a denial-of-service attack Tom Lane (04:49)
  • How to get info about deadlocks? Tom Lane (04:32)
  • Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org: Non-member submission from [Joe Brenner <doom(at)kzsu(dot)stanford(dot)edu>] (fwd) Vince Vielhaber (03:05)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Re: Concurrent VACUUM: first results Hiroshi Inoue (00:29)
• 28 November 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] How to get OID from INSERT in PL/PGSQL? Tom Lane (23:31)
  • Re: [HACKERS] UNION not allowed in sub-selects? Tom Lane (22:45)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_ctl Tim Holloway (20:05)
  • UNION not allowed in sub-selects? Oliver Elphick (19:51)
  • [HACKERS] How to get OID from INSERT in PL/PGSQL? Ed Loehr (19:43)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails Tom Lane (17:44)
  • AD:Family Reunion T Shirts & More hifiber7 (16:00)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails Peter Eisentraut (15:10)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A bag of psql goodies Peter Eisentraut (15:09)
  • Re: Concurrent VACUUM: first results Tom Lane (03:04)
• 27 November 1999
  • Bugfix RPM release available for immediate download Lamar Owen (22:09)
  • Referential Integrety Stephen Birch (18:25)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_ctl Tom Lane (17:10)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_ctl Tatsuo Ishii (06:42)
  • Re: pg_ctl Tom Lane (05:00)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_ctl Lamar Owen (02:49)
  • Re: pg_ctl Tatsuo Ishii (02:08)
  • Re: Tatsuo Ishii (02:05)
• 26 November 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] substring extraction Jan Wieck (23:31)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Hiroshi Inoue (22:50)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Lamar Owen (21:54)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Mike Mascari (20:39)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Lamar Owen (20:09)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Mike Mascari (19:52)
  • Credit Kard 100$ Iradm (19:23)
  • Re: [HACKERS] run_check problem Bruce Momjian (18:58)
  • Re: [HACKERS] run_check problem Keith Parks (18:17)
  • Re: [PATCHES] A bag of psql goodiesu Bruce Momjian (17:48)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Tom Lane (16:14)
  • Re: Lamar Owen (16:06)
  • Re: pg_ctl Tom Lane (15:38)
  • Re: [HACKERS] substring extraction Karel Zak - Zakkr (14:50)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum Grzegorz Przeździecki (14:29)
  • Re: [HACKERS] substring extraction jose soares (14:22)
  • AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transaction s Zeugswetter Andreas SEV (10:30)
  • Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Mike Mascari (10:13)
  • Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Vadim Mikheev (10:12)
  • AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Zeugswetter Andreas SEV (09:38)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Mike Mascari (09:27)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type Adriaan Joubert (07:12)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Vadim Mikheev (07:01)
  • Re: pg_ctl Chairudin Sentosa Harjo (06:56)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Tom Lane (06:54)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Vadim Mikheev (06:45)
  • Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster? Michael Meskes (06:43)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Vadim Mikheev (06:42)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Tom Lane (06:38)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Hiroshi Inoue (06:21)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Tom Lane (05:57)
  • Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Vadim Mikheev (05:52)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Vadim Mikheev (05:33)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Bruce Momjian (05:10)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Hiroshi Inoue (04:47)
  • Re: your mail Bruce Momjian (04:41)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Bruce Momjian (04:12)
  • Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster? Bruce Momjian (04:04)
  • [no subject] Tatsuo Ishii (02:12)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Hiroshi Inoue (01:06)
• 25 November 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] ':' and ';' operators mascarm (22:14)
  • Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster? Tim Holloway (21:53)
  • Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster? Dmitry Samersoff (20:13)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]