Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and comments

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and comments
Date: 1999-10-07 17:50:30
Message-ID: 199910071750.NAA02744@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Efficiency is all, along with (probably) the backend being unhappy
> >> getting *only* a comment and no query.
>
> > That is fixed now.
>
> Is it? postgres.c treats an all-whitespace input as an empty query,
> but if you pass it a comment and nothing else it will cycle the parser/
> planner/executor, and I'm not sure every phase of that process behaves
> reasonably on empty input. Also, that path will not produce the
> "empty query" response code that you get from all-whitespace input.
> I *think* libpq doesn't depend on that anymore, but other frontend
> libraries might...

postgres -D /u/pg/data test

POSTGRES backend interactive interface
$Revision: 1.130 $ $Date: 1999/09/29 16:06:10 $

backend> -- test
backend>

Is that what you mean?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 1999-10-07 21:47:43 Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments
Previous Message Roberto Cornacchia 1999-10-07 17:47:21 Top N queries and disbursion