• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
  • Developer lists
    • pgsql-cluster-hackers
    • pgsql-committers
    • pgsql-hackers
    • pgsql-rrreviewers
    • pgsql-testers
    • pgsql-www
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-hackers 1999-09 Chronological Index (1/6)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• 30 September 1999
  • TO_CHAR() Zakkr (18:22)
  • Re: [HACKERS] postmaster dead on startup from unportable SSL patch Bruce Momjian (17:53)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Win32 pЭort of libpq Vince Vielhaber (16:09)
  • Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #2 Lamar Owen (15:46)
  • RI status report #3 Jan Wieck (15:03)
  • ODBC-client->Linux-server: datatype boolean not recognized? Jelle Ruttenberg (14:44)
  • [no subject] Tom Lane (13:33)
  • RE: Ansley, Michael (13:28)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests on intel for 6.5.2 Tom Lane (13:26)
  • [no subject] David Gilbert (13:17)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Win32 pЭort of libpq Dmitry Samersoff (12:52)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Win32 pЭort of libpq Vince Vielhaber (12:06)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Win32 pЭort of libpq Dmitry Samersoff (11:43)
  • prosrc index removed Jan Wieck (10:42)
  • Re: [HACKERS] string function Zakkr (09:27)
  • Re: [HACKERS] string function Thomas Lockhart (06:08)
  • Re: [HACKERS] postmaster dead on startup from unportable SSL patch Thomas Lockhart (06:03)
  • Re: Non-beta RPMS for RedHat Linux -- PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Thomas Lockhart (05:54)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests on intel for 6.5.2 Christof Petig (05:50)
  • Win32 püort of libpq Edmund Mergl (05:24)
  • Re: [HACKERS] shared memory 651, freebsd 2.2.7 Don Baccus (04:33)
  • postmaster dead on startup from unportable SSL patch Tom Lane (03:05)
  • Announcement: pgbench-1.1 released Tatsuo Ishii (01:24)
  • Re: [HACKERS] shared memory 651, freebsd 2.2.7 Jan Wieck (01:22)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: New notices? Bruce Momjian (01:16)
• 29 September 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] shared memory 651, freebsd 2.2.7 Tom Lane (23:49)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: New notices? Tom Lane (23:40)
  • shared memory 651, freebsd 2.2.7 Jason Venner (22:27)
  • Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Jan Wieck (22:22)
  • Re: [HACKERS] RI generic trigger procs Jan Wieck (21:49)
  • Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Bruce Momjian (21:42)
  • Re: [HACKERS] another DECIMAL problem Bruce Momjian (21:41)
  • Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #2 Bruce Momjian (21:29)
  • Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #2 Bruce Momjian (21:29)
  • Re: [HACKERS] another DECIMAL problem Jan Wieck (21:16)
  • Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1 The Hermit Hacker (21:16)
  • Re: [HACKERS] RI generic trigger procs Hannu Krosing (20:32)
  • Non-beta RPMS for RedHat Linux -- PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Lamar Owen (19:43)
  • Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #2 Lamar Owen (19:09)
  • Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #2 Jan Wieck (19:09)
  • RI generic trigger procs Jan Wieck (18:53)
  • Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #2 Bruce Momjian (17:52)
  • Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #2 Jan Wieck (17:37)
  • Re: RI and PARSER (was: Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1) Jan Wieck (17:32)
  • Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #2 Bruce Momjian (17:31)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: TODO items Bruce Momjian (17:23)
  • RI status report #2 Jan Wieck (17:16)
  • Re: [HACKERS] string function Zakkr (16:59)
  • RE: RI and PARSER (was: Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1) Jackson, DeJuan (16:35)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: TODO items Peter Eisentraut (16:27)
  • Re: New notices? Thomas Lockhart (15:59)
  • Re: New notices? Bruce Momjian (15:42)
  • Re: [HACKERS] string function Thomas Lockhart (15:31)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Planner drops unreferenced tables --- bug, no? Don Baccus (15:24)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Planner drops unreferenced tables --- bug, no? Jan Wieck (15:22)
  • Re: New notices? Thomas Lockhart (15:08)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Planner drops unreferenced tables --- bug, no? Tom Lane (15:05)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Planner drops unreferenced tables --- bug, no? Jan Wieck (14:58)
  • Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions (fwd) Oleg Bartunov (14:47)
  • Re: [HACKERS] string function Zakkr (14:40)
  • Planner drops unreferenced tables --- bug, no? Tom Lane (14:35)
  • Re: New notices? Bruce Momjian (14:34)
  • Re: [HACKERS] New notices? Bruce Momjian (14:30)
  • Re: RI and PARSER (was: Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1) Jan Wieck (14:09)
  • Re: [HACKERS] string function D'Arcy (14:07)
  • Re: [HACKERS] New notices? Tom Lane (14:05)
  • Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions (fwd) Tom Lane (13:58)
  • New notices? Thomas Lockhart (13:47)
  • Re: [PATCHES] ECPGlib: NULL into bool, force indicator on NULL (2 patches) Christof Petig (13:44)
  • string function Zakkr (13:40)
  • Re: RI and PARSER (was: Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1) Thomas Lockhart (13:35)
  • Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside transaction block Tom Lane (13:34)
  • Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside transaction block Bruce Momjian (13:03)
  • Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions (fwd) Oleg Bartunov (10:19)
  • RE: [HACKERS] MS Access upsizing John Ridout (09:26)
  • Installing PostgreSQL David Godin (09:20)
  • Re: RI and PARSER (was: Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1) Jan Wieck (09:20)
  • RE: [HACKERS] MS Access upsizing John Ridout (09:18)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Recovery on incomplete write Christof Petig (08:45)
  • RE: [HACKERS] MS Access upsizing Ansley, Michael (08:18)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Recovery on incomplete write Hiroshi Inoue (07:18)
  • Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside transaction block Mike Mascari (05:44)
  • Re: RI and PARSER (was: Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1) Thomas Lockhart (04:42)
  • Returned Result via ODBC! Nuchanach Klinjun (03:31)
  • Re: [HACKERS] MS Access upsizing The Hermit Hacker (02:27)
• 28 September 1999
  • My mailbox size Bruce Momjian (20:55)
  • Re: [HACKERS] SYSLOGD facility Bruce Momjian (20:34)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Heads up: does RULES regress test still work for you? Bruce Momjian (19:54)
  • Re: [HACKERS] PG_UPGRADE status Bruce Momjian (18:06)
  • Re: RI and PARSER (was: Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1) Jan Wieck (18:04)
  • MS Access upsizing John Ridout (17:30)
  • Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Bruce Momjian (16:11)
  • Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside transaction block Bruce Momjian (15:29)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Operator definitions Bruce Momjian (15:20)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Operator definitions Bruce Momjian (15:20)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Operator definitions Tom Lane (15:16)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Operator definitions Bruce Momjian (15:13)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Operator definitions Thomas Lockhart (15:06)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Recovery on incomplete write Bruce Momjian (14:55)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Recovery on incomplete write Tom Lane (14:40)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Operator definitions Bruce Momjian (14:34)
  • Re: RI and PARSER (was: Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1) Thomas Lockhart (14:11)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Patch for user-defined C-language functions Tom Lane (13:46)
  • Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1 Thomas Lockhart (13:43)
  • Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside transaction block Tom Lane (13:41)
  • Re: [HACKERS] md.c is feeling much better now, thank you Tom Lane (13:30)
  • Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Bruce Momjian (13:12)
  • Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.2 Bruce Momjian (13:01)
  • Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1 Jan Wieck (12:04)
  • Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree Vadim Mikheev (11:28)
  • RE: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree Ansley, Michael (11:14)
  • Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree Vadim Mikheev (10:51)
  • Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree Vadim Mikheev (10:50)
  • RE: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree Ansley, Michael (10:25)
  • RE: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree Ansley, Michael (10:25)
  • Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree Tatsuo Ishii (09:58)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree Vadim Mikheev (09:01)
  • Latest tree Ansley, Michael (08:44)
  • Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions Oleg Bartunov (08:42)
  • Re: [HACKERS] _text problem in union Zakkr (08:37)
  • Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.2 Oleg Broytmann (07:10)
  • Recovery on incomplete write Hiroshi Inoue (04:48)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Doccumentation Patch for Create Function Bruce Momjian (04:33)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Patch for user-defined C-language functions Bruce Momjian (04:33)
  • Re: [HACKERS] TRUNCATE TABLE patch Bruce Momjian (04:25)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Status report: long-query-string changes Bruce Momjian (04:23)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Vacuum analyze bug CAUGHT Hiroshi Inoue (04:22)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Patch for user-defined C-language functions Bruce Momjian (04:12)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum analyze bug CAUGHT Bruce Momjian (04:11)
  • Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside transaction block Bruce Momjian (04:10)
  • Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside transaction block Bruce Momjian (04:09)
  • Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside transaction block Bruce Momjian (04:08)
  • Re: [HACKERS] md.c is feeling much better now, thank you Bruce Momjian (04:08)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Lexer again. Bruce Momjian (03:41)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Lexer again. Leon (03:32)
  • Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Bruce Momjian (02:57)
  • Re: [HACKERS] _text problem in union Bruce Momjian (01:47)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: IPC on win32 - additions for 6.5.2 and current trees Bruce Momjian (01:43)
  • Re: [HACKERS] _text problem in union Thomas Lockhart (01:34)
  • Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tatsuo Ishii (01:21)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Frustration Hiroshi Inoue (00:40)
  • Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1 Tom Lane (00:07)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests on intel for 6.5.2 Lamar Owen (00:04)
• 27 September 1999
  • RE: [HACKERS] Re: IPC on win32 - additions for 6.5.2 and current trees Hiroshi Inoue (23:50)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests on intel for 6.5.2 Tom Lane (23:47)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: New init script and upgrade attempt: failed Lamar Owen (23:42)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Profiling?] Tom Lane (23:39)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: New init script and upgrade attempt: failed Tom Lane (23:37)
  • Re: [HACKERS] _text problem in union Tom Lane (23:31)
  • Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane (22:50)
  • Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Tom Lane (22:40)
  • Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Jan Wieck (21:17)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Lexer again. Bruce Momjian (21:03)
  • Re: bug in array contrib Bruce Momjian (20:56)
  • Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Bruce Momjian (20:56)
  • Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Bruce Momjian (20:55)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: IPC on win32 - additions for 6.5.2 and current trees Bruce Momjian (20:55)
  • Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Bruce Momjian (20:36)
  • Re: new patches... Bruce Momjian (20:33)
  • Re: patch for large queries Bruce Momjian (20:32)
  • Re: new patches Bruce Momjian (20:31)
  • Re: [HACKERS] IPC on win32 - additions for 6.5.2 and current trees Bruce Momjian (19:55)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Files ... Bruce Momjian (19:43)
  • Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1 Bruce Momjian (19:33)
  • Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions Bruce Momjian (19:31)
  • Re: [GENERAL] Error during 'vacuum analyze' Bruce Momjian (19:02)
  • RI status report #1 Jan Wieck (18:48)
  • Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Bruce Momjian (18:35)
  • Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Bruce Momjian (18:35)
  • Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.2 Bruce Momjian (18:22)
  • Re: [PATCHES] Index access using multi-column indices Bruce Momjian (18:20)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Inefficiencies in COPY command Bruce Momjian (18:07)
  • Re: [HACKERS] another DECIMAL problem Bruce Momjian (18:06)
  • NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions Oleg Bartunov (18:00)
  • Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Bruce Momjian (16:55)
  • Re: [HACKERS] _text problem in union Bruce Momjian (16:52)
  • Re: [HACKERS] _text problem in union Hannu Krosing (16:49)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Cannot insert into temp tables Bruce Momjian (16:44)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Profiling?] Leon (16:42)
  • Re: [PATCHES] RE: [HACKERS] Index access using multi-column indices Bruce Momjian (16:07)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]