• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
  • Developer lists
    • pgsql-cluster-hackers
    • pgsql-committers
    • pgsql-hackers
    • pgsql-rrreviewers
    • pgsql-testers
    • pgsql-www
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-hackers 1999-08 Thread Index (1/4)

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• OID 718 and Circle G. Anthony Reina (Tue 31 22:18)
• CVS Broken? Keith Parks (Tue 31 21:51)
• Re: CVS Broken? The Hermit Hacker (Tue 31 22:57)
• [no subject] fjcuberos (Tue 31 18:27)
• ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog G. Anthony Reina (Tue 31 16:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog Tom Lane (Tue 31 18:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog G. Anthony Reina (Tue 31 19:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog Tom Lane (Tue 31 19:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog G. Anthony Reina (Tue 31 20:09)
• Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog Tom Lane (Tue 31 21:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog G. Anthony Reina (Tue 31 22:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog Thomas Lockhart (Wed 01 01:51)
• bug in array contrib Massimo Dal Zotto (Tue 31 16:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Cyrus Rahman (Tue 31 15:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Tom Lane (Tue 31 15:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Vadim Mikheev (Tue 31 16:22)
• RE: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Hiroshi Inoue (Wed 01 01:34)
• optimizer pruning problem Roberto Cornacchia (Tue 31 12:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] optimizer pruning problem Tom Lane (Tue 31 13:37)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include/parser (parse_node.h parse_oper.h) Thomas Lockhart (Tue 31 05:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include/parser (parse_node.h parse_oper.h) Tom Lane (Tue 31 13:48)
• [no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (Tue 31 00:04)
• [no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (Mon 30 22:04)
• File descriptor leakage? Cyrus Rahman (Mon 30 22:03)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• File descriptor leakage? Cyrus Rahman (Tue 31 00:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Tom Lane (Tue 31 01:51)
• RE: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Hiroshi Inoue (Tue 31 04:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Tom Lane (Tue 31 13:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? The Hermit Hacker (Tue 31 15:23)
• [no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (Mon 30 21:20)
• Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Oliver Elphick (Mon 30 21:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Thomas Lockhart (Tue 31 07:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Tatsuo Ishii (Tue 31 09:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Oleg Bartunov (Tue 31 12:10)
• Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Tatsuo Ishii (Wed 01 02:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Thomas Lockhart (Wed 01 02:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Oleg Broytmann (Tue 31 08:36)
• [no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (Mon 30 20:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] Quoting in stored procedures pgsql-hackers (Mon 30 20:54)
• [no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (Mon 30 17:56)
• bouncefilter added to majordomo lists ... The Hermit Hacker (Mon 30 17:55)
• [no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (Mon 30 17:54)
• Re: HELP Re: pg_group, etc.. Ricardo Coelho (Mon 30 17:54)
• [no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (Mon 30 15:07)
• IPC on win32 - additions for 6.5.2 and current trees Horak Daniel (Mon 30 12:15)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: IPC on win32 - additions for 6.5.2 and current trees yutaka tanida (Tue 31 08:30)
• AW: [HACKERS] [Fwd: bug ? get_groname: group 0 not found] Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 (Mon 30 09:59)
• An optimisation question Constantin Teodorescu (Mon 30 06:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] An optimisation question Tom Lane (Mon 30 14:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] An optimisation question Constantin Teodorescu (Mon 30 15:34)
• [no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (Mon 30 02:11)
• [no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (Sun 29 20:09)
• Why not sub-selects in targetlists? Tom Lane (Sun 29 17:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] Why not sub-selects in targetlists? Vadim Mikheev (Mon 30 01:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] Why not sub-selects in targetlists? Tom Lane (Mon 30 15:05)
• PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tatsuo Ishii (Sun 29 12:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tom Lane (Sun 29 16:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 The Hermit Hacker (Sun 29 19:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tatsuo Ishii (Mon 30 02:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 The Hermit Hacker (Mon 30 17:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Massimo Dal Zotto (Tue 31 16:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tom Lane (Tue 31 17:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 The Hermit Hacker (Tue 31 19:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Massimo Dal Zotto (Tue 31 20:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Massimo Dal Zotto (Tue 31 20:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tom Lane (Tue 31 21:53)
• ANSI SQL compliance Jernej Zajc (Sun 29 12:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] ANSI SQL compliance Tom Lane (Sun 29 16:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] ANSI SQL compliance Hannu Krosing (Sun 29 20:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] ANSI SQL compliance Thomas Lockhart (Tue 31 06:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] ANSI SQL compliance Jernej Zajc (Mon 30 06:27)
• [no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (Sun 29 10:40)
• Cluster on (index-name) loose NOT NULL properties Constantin Teodorescu (Sun 29 07:29)
• entries in pg_shadow Michael Richards (Sun 29 00:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] entries in pg_shadow Tom Lane (Sun 29 01:05)
• Quoting in stored procedures Jochen Topf (Sat 28 21:20)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Quoting in stored procedures pgsql-hackers (Sat 28 21:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] Quoting in stored procedures Tom Lane (Sun 29 00:54)
• [Fwd: bug ? get_groname: group 0 not found] Spirou (Sat 28 20:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: bug ? get_groname: group 0 not found] Tom Lane (Sun 29 00:51)
• Performance of MIN() and MAX() Gene Sokolov (Fri 27 14:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Performance of MIN() and MAX() Tom Lane (Fri 27 15:31)
• PG FAQ in PDF format Bruce Momjian (Thu 26 18:39)
• Files ... Dmitry Samersoff (Thu 26 16:43)
• out of memory errors Clayton Cottingham (Wed 25 22:47)
• stuck spinlock Lori Allen (Wed 25 17:40)
• AW: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 (Wed 25 14:33)
• PATCH for Statement Triggers Support F.J. Cuberos (Wed 25 11:23)
• pg_log 100MB per day !!! on 5MB of data Richard Bouska (Wed 25 06:36)
• Re: memory requirements question Tom Lane (Tue 24 20:37)
• [no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (Tue 24 19:15)
• RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael (Tue 24 11:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon (Tue 24 12:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Adriaan Joubert (Tue 24 13:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon (Tue 24 14:12)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael (Tue 24 11:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon (Tue 24 12:28)
• RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael (Tue 24 13:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon (Tue 24 14:13)
• RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael (Wed 25 07:49)
• RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael (Wed 25 07:59)
• AW: [HACKERS] Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 (Tue 24 09:48)
• RE: [HACKERS] Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Hiroshi Inoue (Tue 24 10:36)
• Re: AW: [HACKERS] Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Theo Kramer (Tue 24 15:33)
• Lex and things... Ansley, Michael (Tue 24 08:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon (Tue 24 10:37)
• [no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (Tue 24 02:35)
• Attempt to crack ftp site Daniele Orlandi (Mon 23 22:45)
• Re: [MIRRORS] Attempt to crack ftp site The Hermit Hacker (Mon 23 23:20)
• OID and PL/pgSQL trigger :-( Alke (Mon 23 13:54)
• Array-fields and many-to-many relations Alke (Mon 23 13:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Array-fields and many-to-many relations Tom Lane (Mon 23 14:24)
• ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 José Soares (Mon 23 13:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 Tom Lane (Mon 23 14:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 José Soares (Mon 23 15:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 Tom Lane (Mon 23 15:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 José Soares (Fri 27 12:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 Tom Lane (Fri 27 13:58)
• trigger: run in transaction Zakkr (Mon 23 12:08)
• [no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (Mon 23 09:40)
• Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Tom Lane (Sat 21 03:59)
• RE: [HACKERS] Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Hiroshi Inoue (Mon 23 23:50)
• Sorting costs (was Caution: tonight's commits force initdb) Tom Lane (Tue 24 14:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] Sorting costs (was Caution: tonight's commits force initdb) Hannu Krosing (Tue 24 18:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] Sorting costs (was Caution: tonight's commits force initdb) Tom Lane (Tue 24 21:15)
• RE: [HACKERS] Sorting costs (was Caution: tonight's commits force initdb) Hiroshi Inoue (Wed 25 00:15)
• sorting by << correct for rtrees? Tom Lane (Sat 21 02:15)
• [no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (Fri 20 20:37)
• What does it mean? Dmitry Samersoff (Fri 20 16:37)
• RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Mike Mascari (Fri 20 09:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tatsuo Ishii (Tue 24 01:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane (Tue 24 15:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane (Tue 24 20:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tatsuo Ishii (Wed 25 00:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Bruce Momjian (Wed 25 00:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane (Wed 25 13:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size The Hermit Hacker (Wed 25 14:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tatsuo Ishii (Wed 25 13:57)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane (Tue 24 16:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Brian E Gallew (Tue 24 17:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane (Tue 24 20:52)
• RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Hiroshi Inoue (Wed 25 01:09)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Bruce Momjian (Tue 24 04:01)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Ansley, Michael (Wed 25 14:00)
• RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size The Hermit Hacker (Wed 25 14:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Leon (Wed 25 16:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane (Wed 25 14:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size The Hermit Hacker (Wed 25 14:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane (Wed 25 15:04)
• RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Ansley, Michael (Wed 25 14:21)
• Statement Triggers Patch F.J. Cuberos (Fri 20 09:22)
• RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael (Fri 20 08:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Leon (Fri 20 10:09)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael (Fri 20 09:30)
• RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael (Fri 20 10:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Leon (Fri 20 13:34)
• RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael (Fri 20 10:40)
• RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael (Fri 20 10:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Tom Lane (Fri 20 16:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Leon (Fri 20 21:15)
• RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael (Fri 20 14:06)
• RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael (Fri 20 14:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Brook Milligan (Fri 20 14:57)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Tom Lane (Fri 20 16:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Thomas Lockhart (Tue 31 04:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Tom Lane (Tue 31 14:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Thomas Lockhart (Tue 31 15:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Leon (Tue 31 18:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Thomas Lockhart (Wed 01 02:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Leon (Fri 20 18:30)
• RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael (Sat 21 08:21)
• RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael (Tue 31 14:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Tom Lane (Tue 31 14:19)
• RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael (Tue 31 14:21)
• auth 30105652 subscribe pgsql-hackers xbouska(at)bsdi(dot)infima(dot)cz Richard Bouska (Fri 20 08:08)
• pg_log >> groving to infinity in 6.5.1 Richard Bouska (Fri 20 07:30)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• pg_log >> groving to infinity in 6.5.1 Richard Bouska (Fri 20 08:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_log >> growing to infinity in 6.5.1 Theo Kramer (Sun 22 03:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_log >> growing to infinity in 6.5.1 Theo Kramer (Sun 22 05:32)
• Re: Bug#43221: postgresql: When disk is full, insert corrupts indices Oliver Elphick (Fri 20 05:09)

---

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc